Clinical testing panels for ALS: global distribution, consistency, and challenges
Dilliott, Allison A.; Al Nasser, Ahmad; Elnagheeb, Marwa; Fifita, Jennifer; Henden, Lyndal; Keseler, Ingrid M.; Lenz, Steven; Marriott, Heather; Mccann, Emily; Mesaros, Maysen; Opie-Martin, Sarah; Owens, Emma; Palus, Brooke; Ross, Justyne; Wang, Zhanjun; White, Hannah; Al-Chalabi, Ammar; Andersen, Peter M.; Benatar, Michael; Blair, Ian; Cooper-Knock, Johnathan; Harrington, Elizabeth A.; Heckmann, Jeannine; Landers, John; Moreno, Cristiane; Nel, Melissa; Rampersaud, Evadnie; Roggenbuck, Jennifer; Rouleau, Guy; Traynor, Bryan; Van Blitterswijk, Marka; Van Rheenen, Wouter; Veldink, Jan; Weishaupt, Jochen; Drury, Luke; Harms, Matthew B.; Farhan, Sali M.K.; On behalf of the Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis spectrum disorders Gene Curation Expert Panel
(2023) Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration, volume 24, issue 5-6, pp. 420 - 435
(Article)
Abstract
Objective: In 2021, the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) spectrum disorders Gene Curation Expert Panel (GCEP) was established to evaluate the strength of evidence for genes previously reported to be associated with ALS. Through this endeavor, we will provide standardized guidance to laboratories on which genes should
... read more
be included in clinical genetic testing panels for ALS. In this manuscript, we aimed to assess the heterogeneity in the current global landscape of clinical genetic testing for ALS. Methods: We reviewed the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Genetic Testing Registry (GTR) and members of the ALS GCEP to source frequently used testing panels and compare the genes included on the tests. Results: 14 clinical panels specific to ALS from 14 laboratories covered 4 to 54 genes. All panels report on ANG, SOD1, TARDBP, and VAPB; 50% included or offered the option of including C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion (HRE) analysis. Of the 91 genes included in at least one of the panels, 40 (44.0%) were included on only a single panel. We could not find a direct link to ALS in the literature for 14 (15.4%) included genes. Conclusions: The variability across the surveyed clinical genetic panels is concerning due to the possibility of reduced diagnostic yields in clinical practice and risk of a missed diagnoses for patients. Our results highlight the necessity for consensus regarding the appropriateness of gene inclusions in clinical genetic ALS tests to improve its application for patients living with ALS and their families.
show less
Download/Full Text
Keywords: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, clinical laboratories, gene panels, gene-disease relationships, genetic testing, Neurology, Clinical Neurology
ISSN: 2167-8421
Publisher: Informa Healthcare
Note: Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
(Peer reviewed)