Effect of immediate and prolonged GLP-1 receptor agonist administration on uric acid and kidney clearance: post-hoc analyses of four clinical trials
Tonneijck, Lennart; Muskiet, Marcel H A; Smits, Mark M; Bjornstad, Petter; Kramer, Mark H H; Diamant, Michaela; Hoorn, Ewout J.; Joles, Jaap A; van Raalte, Daniël H
(2018) Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, volume 20, issue 5, pp. 1235 - 1245
(Article)
Abstract
Aims: To determine the effects of glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 receptor agonists (RA) on uric acid (UA) levels and kidney UA clearance. Material and methods: This study involved post-hoc analyses of 4 controlled clinical trials, which assessed actions of GLP-1RA administration on kidney physiology. The immediate effects of GLP-1RA exenatide infusion
... read more
vs placebo were determined in 9 healthy overweight men (Study-A) and in 52 overweight T2DM patients (Study-B). The effects of 12 weeks of long-acting GLP-1RA liraglutide vs placebo in 36 overweight T2DM patients (Study-C) and of 8 weeks of short-acting GLP-1RA lixisenatide vs once-daily titrated insulin glulisine in 35 overweight T2DM patients (Study-D) were also examined. Plasma UA, fractional (inulin-corrected) and absolute urinary excretion of UA (UE UA) and sodium (UE Na), and urine pH were determined. Results: Median baseline plasma UA level was 5.39 to 6.33 mg/dL across all studies (17%-22% of subjects were hyperuricaemic). In Study-A, exenatide infusion slightly increased plasma UA (+0.07 ± 0.02 mg/dL, P =.04), and raised absolute-UE UA (+1.58 ± 0.65 mg/min/1.73 m 2, P =.02), but did not affect fractional UE UA compared to placebo. Fractional UE UA and absolute UE UA correlated with increases in urine pH (r:0.86, P =.003 and r:0.92, P <.001, respectively). Fractional UE UA correlated with increased fractional UE Na (r:0.76, P =.02). In Study-B, exenatide infusion did not affect plasma UA, but increased fractional UE UA (+0.76 ± 0.38%, P =.049) and absolute UE UA (+0.75 ± 0.27 mg/min/1.73 m 2, P =.007), compared to placebo. In regression analyses, both parameters were explained by changes in urine pH and, in part, by changes in UE Na. In Study-C, liraglutide treatment did not affect plasma UA, UE UA, UE Na or urine pH, compared to placebo. In Study-D, lixisenatide treatment increased UE Na and urine pH from baseline, but did not affect plasma UA or UE UA. Conclusion: Immediate exenatide infusion increases UE UA in overweight healthy men and in T2DM patients, probably by inhibiting Na +/H +-exchanger type-3 in the renal proximal tubule. Prolonged treatment with a long-acting or short-acting GLP-1RA does not affect plasma UA or UE UA in T2DM patients with normal plasma UA levels and at relatively low cardiovascular risk. Our results suggest that the cardio-renal benefits of GLP-1RA are not mediated through changes in UA.
show less
Download/Full Text
The full text of this publication is not available.
Keywords: Journal Article, liraglutide, randomised trial, GLP-1, type 2 diabetes, diabetic nephropathy, exenatide, Weight Loss/drug effects, Overweight/complications, Humans, Middle Aged, Diabetic Nephropathies/chemically induced, Male, Young Adult, Kidney/drug effects, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor/agonists, Adult, Female, Renal Elimination/drug effects, Body Mass Index, Uric Acid/blood, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications, Renal Insufficiency/chemically induced, Obesity/complications, Peptides/adverse effects, Anti-Obesity Agents/adverse effects, Aged, Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects, Insulin/adverse effects, Endocrinology, Internal Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Randomized Controlled Trial, Journal Article, Comparative Study
ISSN: 1462-8902
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Note: Funding Information: TheresearchleadingtotheresultsofStudiesAto C received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement 282521–the SAFEGUARD project, and from the Dutch Kidney Foundation under grant agreement IP12.87. For Study-C Novo Nordisk provided liraglutide and liraglutide-placebo pens. Study-D was an investigator-initiated study, planned and conducted entirely under the scientific supervision of M.D. and, after her passing in 2014, of D.H.v.R. and M.H.H.K. Funding for the study was provided by Sanofi-Aventis. Sanofi-Aventis provided prefilled lixisenatide and insulin glulisine pens for subcutaneous use. Self-monitoring blood glucose devices were provided by Menarini Diagnostics. The funders of all studies had no role in study design or in collection, analysis and interpretation of data, in writing of the report or in the decision to submit the article for publication. Funding Information: The authors extend their gratitude to all study participants for their time and commitment to the demanding protocols. We thank J. Boerop and S. Gassman (Diabetes Center, Department of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) for excellent practical support during the test visits. The technical laboratory assistance of A. Dijk and N. Willekes-Koolschijn (Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands) was much appreciated. We thank Dr. R. G. IJzerman for his clinical guidance whenever that was needed during the conduct of Study-D. Parts of the data from Study-B and Study-C were presented at the 76th Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association (New Orleans, Louisiana, June 10–14, 2016). L. T. consulted for Eli Lilly & Co. M. H. A. M. has consulted for Eli Lilly & Co. and Novo Nordisk. Through M. H. H. K. and M. D., the VU University Medical Center received research grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi. D. H. vR. serves on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi. The above authors declare that they did not receive personal fees in connection with their roles described above; all honoraria were paid to their employer (the VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). P. B. has a consultancy agreement with Boehringer Ingelheim. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article are reported. L. T. designed Study-D, performed the measurements, analysed and interpreted the data and drafted and completed the final manuscript. M. H. A. M. designed Study-D, performed measurements, was involved in statistical analyses and interpretation of data, and contributed to the drafting and critical revision of the manuscript. M. M. S. designed Studies A to C, performed measurements, was involved in statistical analyses, and contributed to the critical revision of the manuscript. M. D. designed all studies and was initially involved in the discussion and supervision. P. B., M. H. H. K, E. J. H., J. A. J. and D. H. vR. contributed to the interpretation of data, discussion of intellectual content and critical editing of the manuscript. Publisher Copyright: © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
(Peer reviewed)