Diagnostics in tarsal fusion: The theory and practise in The Netherlands

Abstract

Background: This study compares the preferences of Dutch orthopaedic surgeons for different diagnostic modalities in performing tarsal fusions versus consensus, evidence or expert opinion reported in the literature. Methods: A literature search of Medline was performed to obtain evidence-based information on various diagnostic tools. In addition, 89 registered Dutch foot and ankle surgeons were sent a questionnaire concerning the diagnostic modalities use in tarsal fusion. Results: Fifty-eight (65%) questionnaires were returned. The experienced surgeons measured outcomes significantly more often than other surgeons. Diagnostic injections were often used, although scant evidence exists in the literature. Postoperative diagnostics mainly consist of X-ray examination, although there is consensus in the literature that computed tomography is more accurate. Conclusions: The study revealed some surprising discrepancies concerning the use of diagnostic imaging in tarsal fusion. More clinical research is needed to identify the most effective diagnostic imaging modalities so as to encourage their wider adoption.