Development and validation of a deep learning-based method for automatic measurement of uterus, fibroid, and ablated volume in MRI after MR-HIFU treatment of uterine fibroids

Abstract

Introduction: The non-perfused volume divided by total fibroid load (NPV/TFL) is a predictive outcome parameter for MRI-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) treatments of uterine fibroids, which is related to long-term symptom relief. In current clinical practice, the MR-HIFU outcome parameters are typically determined by visual inspection, so an automated computer-aided method could facilitate objective outcome quantification. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a deep learning-based segmentation algorithm for volume measurements of the uterus, uterine fibroids, and NPVs in MRI in order to automatically quantify the NPV/TFL. Materials and Methods: A segmentation pipeline was developed and evaluated using expert manual segmentations of MRI scans of 115 uterine fibroid patients, screened for and/or undergoing MR-HIFU treatment. The pipeline contained three separate neural networks, one per target structure. The first step in the pipeline was uterus segmentation from contrast-enhanced (CE)-T1w scans. This segmentation was subsequently used to remove non-uterus background tissue for NPV and fibroid segmentation. In the following step, NPVs were segmented from uterus-only CE-T1w scans. Finally, fibroids were segmented from uterus-only T2w scans. The segmentations were used to calculate the volume for each structure. Reliability and agreement between manual and automatic segmentations, volumes, and NPV/TFLs were assessed. Results: For treatment scans, the Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) between the manually and automatically obtained segmentations were 0.90 (uterus), 0.84 (NPV) and 0.74 (fibroid). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were 1.00 [0.99, 1.00] (uterus), 0.99 [0.98, 1.00] (NPV) and 0.98 [0.95, 0.99] (fibroid) between manually and automatically derived volumes. For manually and automatically derived NPV/TFLs, the mean difference was 5% [-41%, 51%] (ICC: 0.66 [0.32, 0.85]). Conclusion: The algorithm presented in this study automatically calculates uterus volume, fibroid load, and NPVs, which could lead to more objective outcome quantification after MR-HIFU treatments of uterine fibroids in comparison to visual inspection. When robustness has been ascertained in a future study, this tool may eventually be employed in clinical practice to automatically measure the NPV/TFL after MR-HIFU procedures of uterine fibroids.