Safety of Switching from a Vitamin K Antagonist to a Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant in Frail Older Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Results of the FRAIL-AF Randomized Controlled Trial
Joosten, Linda P T; van Doorn, Sander; van de Ven, Peter M; Köhlen, Bart T G; Nierman, Melchior C; Koek, Huiberdina L; Hemels, Martin E W; Huisman, Menno V; Kruip, Marieke; Faber, Laura M; Wiersma, Nynke M; Buding, Wim F; Fijnheer, Rob; Adriaansen, Henk J; Roes, Kit C; Hoes, Arno W; Rutten, Frans H; Geersing, Geert-Jan
(2024) Circulation, volume 149, issue 4, pp. 279 - 289
(Article)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is ambiguity whether frail patients with atrial fibrillation managed with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) should be switched to a non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC). METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled superiority trial. Older patients with atrial fibrillation living with frailty (≥75 years of age plus
... read more
a Groningen Frailty Indicator score ≥3) were randomly assigned to switch from international normalized ratio-guided VKA treatment to an NOAC or to continued VKA treatment. Patients with a glomerular filtration rate <30 mL·min-1·1.73 m-2or with valvular atrial fibrillation were excluded. Follow-up was 12 months. The cause-specific hazard ratio was calculated for occurrence of the primary outcome that was a major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding complication, whichever came first, accounting for death as a competing risk. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle. Secondary outcomes included thromboembolic events. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and June 2022, a total of 2621 patients were screened for eligibility and 1330 patients were randomly assigned (mean age 83 years, median Groningen Frailty Indicator score 4). After randomization, 6 patients in the switch-to-NOAC arm and 1 patient in the continue-with-VKA arm were excluded due to the presence of exclusion criteria, leaving 662 patients switched from a VKA to an NOAC and 661 patients continued VKAs in the intention-to-treat population. After 163 primary outcome events (101 in the switch arm, 62 in the continue arm), the trial was stopped for futility according to a prespecified futility analysis. The hazard ratio for our primary outcome was 1.69 (95% CI, 1.23-2.32). The hazard ratio for thromboembolic events was 1.26 (95% CI, 0.60-2.61). CONCLUSIONS: Switching international normalized ratio-guided VKA treatment to an NOAC in frail older patients with atrial fibrillation was associated with more bleeding complications compared with continuing VKA treatment, without an associated reduction in thromboembolic complications. REGISTRATION: URL: https://eudract.ema.europa.eu; Unique identifier: 2017-000393-11. URL: https://eudract.ema.europa.eu; Unique identifier: 6721 (FRAIL-AF study).
show less
Download/Full Text
The full text of this publication is not available.
Keywords: anticoagulants, atrial fibrillation, frail elderly, vitamin K, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Physiology (medical), Journal Article
ISSN: 0009-7322
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Note: Publisher Copyright: © 2024 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
(Peer reviewed)