Gene Therapy with Etranacogene Dezaparvovec for Hemophilia B
Pipe, Steven W; Leebeek, Frank W G; Recht, Michael; Key, Nigel S; Castaman, Giancarlo; Miesbach, Wolfgang; Lattimore, Susan; Peerlinck, Kathelijne; Van der Valk, Paul; Coppens, Michiel; Kampmann, Peter; Meijer, Karina; O'Connell, Niamh; Pasi, K John; Hart, Daniel P; Kazmi, Rashid; Astermark, Jan; Hermans, Cedric R J R; Klamroth, Robert; Lemons, Richard; Visweshwar, Nathan; von Drygalski, Annette; Young, Guy; Crary, Shelley E; Escobar, Miguel; Gomez, Esteban; Kruse-Jarres, Rebecca; Quon, Doris V; Symington, Emily; Wang, Michael; Wheeler, Allison P; Gut, Robert; Liu, Ying P; Dolmetsch, Ricardo E; Cooper, David L; Li, Yanyan; Goldstein, Brahm; Monahan, Paul E
(2023) The New England journal of medicine, volume 388, issue 8, pp. 706 - 718
(Article)
Abstract
Background: Moderate-to-severe hemophilia B is treated with lifelong, continuous coagulation factor IX replacement to prevent bleeding. Gene therapy for hemophilia B aims to establish sustained factor IX activity, thereby protecting against bleeding without burdensome factor IX replacement. Methods: In this open-label, phase 3 study, after a lead-in period (≥6 months)
... read more
of factor IX prophylaxis, we administered one infusion of adeno-associated virus 5 (AAV5) vector expressing the Padua factor IX variant (etranacogene dezaparvovec; 2×1013 genome copies per kilogram of body weight) to 54 men with hemophilia B (factor IX activity ≤2% of the normal value) regardless of preexisting AAV5 neutralizing antibodies. The primary end point was the annualized bleeding rate, evaluated in a noninferiority analysis comparing the rate during months 7 through 18 after etranacogene dezaparvovec treatment with the rate during the lead-in period. Noninferiority of etranacogene dezaparvovec was defined as an upper limit of the two-sided 95% Wald confidence interval of the annualized bleeding rate ratio that was less than the noninferiority margin of 1.8. Superiority, additional efficacy measures, and safety were also assessed. Results: The annualized bleeding rate decreased from 4.19 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.22 to 5.45) during the lead-in period to 1.51 (95% CI, 0.81 to 2.82) during months 7 through 18 after treatment, for a rate ratio of 0.36 (95% Wald CI, 0.20 to 0.64; P<0.001), demonstrating noninferiority and superiority of etranacogene dezaparvovec as compared with factor IX prophylaxis. Factor IX activity had increased from baseline by a least-squares mean of 36.2 percentage points (95% CI, 31.4 to 41.0) at 6 months and 34.3 percentage points (95% CI, 29.5 to 39.1) at 18 months after treatment, and usage of factor IX concentrate decreased by a mean of 248,825 IU per year per participant in the post-treatment period (P<0.001 for all three comparisons). Benefits and safety were observed in participants with predose AAV5 neutralizing antibody titers of less than 700. No treatment-related serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions: Etranacogene dezaparvovec gene therapy was superior to prophylactic factor IX with respect to the annualized bleeding rate, and it had a favorable safety profile.
show less
Download/Full Text
The full text of this publication is not available.
Keywords: Factor IX/genetics, Genetic Therapy/methods, Genetic Vectors/administration & dosage, Hemophilia B/complications, Hemorrhage/etiology, Humans, Male, Pediatrics, Hematology/Oncology, Childhood Diseases, Coagulation, Genetics General, Genetics, General Medicine, Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article
ISSN: 0028-4793
Publisher: Massachussetts Medical Society
Note: Publisher Copyright: © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.
(Peer reviewed)