A multigenomic liquid biopsy biomarker for neuroendocrine tumor disease outperforms CgA and has surgical and clinical utility
Modlin, I. M.; Kidd, M.; Falconi, M.; Filosso, P. L.; Frilling, A.; Malczewska, A.; Toumpanakis, C.; Valk, G.; Pacak, K.; Bodei, L.; Öberg, K. E.
(2021) Annals of Oncology, volume 32, issue 11, pp. 1425 - 1433
(Article)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Biomarkers are key tools in cancer management. In neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), Chromogranin A (CgA) was considered acceptable as a biomarker. We compared the clinical efficacy of a multigenomic blood biomarker (NETest) to CgA over a 5-year period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observational, prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter, multinational, comparative cohort assessment.
... read more
Cohort 1: NETest evaluation in NETs (n = 1684) and cancers, benign diseases, controls (n = 731). Cohort 2: (n = 1270): matched analysis of NETest/CgA in a sub-cohort of NETs (n = 922) versus other diseases and controls (n = 348). Disease status was assessed by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). NETest measurement: qPCR [upper limit of normal (ULN: 20)], CgA (EuroDiagnostica, ULN: 108 ng/ml). STATISTICS: Mann-Whitney U-test, AUROC, chi-square and McNemar' test. RESULTS: Cohort 1: NETest diagnostic accuracy was 91% (P < 0.0001) and identified pheochromocytomas (98%), small intestine (94%), pancreas (91%), lung (88%), gastric (80%) and appendix (79%). NETest reflected grading: G1: 40 ± 1, G2 (50 ± 1) and G3 (52 ± 1). Locoregional disease levels were lower (38 ± 1) than metastatic (52 ± 1, P < 0.0001). NETest accurately stratified RECIST-assessed disease extent: no disease (21 ± 1), stable (43 ± 2), progressive (62 ± 2) (P < 0.0001). NETest concordance with imaging (CT/MRI/ 68Ga-SSA-PET) 91%. Presurgery, all NETs (n = 153) were positive (100%). After palliative R1/R2 surgery (n = 51) all (100%) remained elevated. After curative R0-surgery (n = 102), NETest levels were normal in 81 (70%) with no recurrence at 2 years. In the 31 (30%) with elevated levels, 25 (81%) recurred within 2 years. Cohort #2: NETest diagnostic accuracy was 87% and CgA 54% (P < 0.0001). NETest was more accurate than CgA for grading (chi-square = 7.7, OR = 18.5) and metastatic identification (chi-square = 180, OR = 8.4). NETest identified progressive disease (95%) versus CgA (57%, P < 0.0001). Imaging concordance for NETest was 91% versus CgA (46%) (P < 0.0001). Recurrence prediction after surgery was NETest-positive in >94% versus CgA 11%. CONCLUSION: NETest accurately diagnoses NETs and is an effective surrogate marker for imaging, grade, metastases and disease status compared to CgA. A multigenomic liquid biopsy is an accurate biomarker of NET disease.
show less
Download/Full Text
The full text of this publication is not available.
Keywords: biomarker, Chromogranin, NET, NETest, neuroendocrine tumor, Liquid Biopsy, Chromogranin A, Prospective Studies, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics, Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis, Neuroendocrine Tumors/genetics, Hematology, Oncology, Observational Study, Multicenter Study, Journal Article
ISSN: 0923-7534
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Note: Funding Information: KEÖ is a senior professor Uppsala University, has received honoraria from Novartis, IPSEN, AAA, DQS, Wren, Camurus and ITM. Centers of Excellence reviewer for ENETS. IMM: consultant for Novartis, Ipsen, Wren, Wyeth, Nycomed, RadioMedix and Mallinckrodt. MK: employee of Wren. MF: research grants and advisory role for: J&J, Novartis, Ipsen, AAA, Mylan and Celgene. AF: has received educational grants and research grants from Novartis. Speaker honorarium from Novartis for work not related to the present paper. CT: IPSEN honoraria for lectures, advisory boards and educational grants. LB: unpaid consultant/advisor AAA and Ipsen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Funding Information: None declared. KE? is a senior professor Uppsala University, has received honoraria from Novartis, IPSEN, AAA, DQS, Wren, Camurus and ITM. Centers of Excellence reviewer for ENETS. IMM: consultant for Novartis, Ipsen, Wren, Wyeth, Nycomed, RadioMedix and Mallinckrodt. MK: employee of Wren. MF: research grants and advisory role for: J&J, Novartis, Ipsen, AAA, Mylan and Celgene. AF: has received educational grants and research grants from Novartis. Speaker honorarium from Novartis for work not related to the present paper. CT: IPSEN honoraria for lectures, advisory boards and educational grants. LB: unpaid consultant/advisor AAA and Ipsen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 European Society for Medical Oncology Copyright © 2021 European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved.
(Peer reviewed)