Bone visualization of the cervical spine with deep learning-based synthetic CT compared to conventional CT: A single-center noninferiority study on image quality
van der Kolk, Brigitta (Britt) Y.M.; Slotman, Derk J.(Jorik); Nijholt, Ingrid M.; van Osch, Jochen A.C.; Snoeijink, Tess J.; Podlogar, Martin; van Hasselt, Boudewijn A.A.M.; Boelhouwers, Henk J.; van Stralen, Marijn; Seevinck, Peter R.; Schep, Niels W.L.; Maas, Mario; Boomsma, Martijn F.
(2022) European Journal of Radiology, volume 154, pp. 1 - 9
(Article)
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate whether the image quality of a specific deep learning-based synthetic CT (sCT) of the cervical spine is noninferior to conventional CT. Method: Paired MRI and CT data were collected from 25 consecutive participants (≥ 50 years) with cervical radiculopathy. The MRI exam included a T1-weighted multiple gradient
... read more
echo sequence for sCT reconstruction. For qualitative image assessment, four structures at two vertebral levels were evaluated on sCT and compared with CT by three assessors using a four-point scale (range 1–4). The noninferiority margin was set at 0.5 point on this scale. Additionally, acceptable image quality was defined as a score of 3–4 in ≥ 80% of the scans. Quantitative assessment included geometrical analysis and voxelwise comparisons. Results: Qualitative image assessment showed that sCT was noninferior to CT for overall bone image quality, artifacts, imaging of intervertebral joints and neural foramina at levels C3-C4 and C6-C7, and cortical delineation at C6-C7. Noninferiority was weak to absent for cortical delineation at level C3-C4 and trabecular bone at both levels. Acceptable image quality was achieved for all structures in sCT and CT, except for trabecular bone in sCT and level C6-C7 in CT. Geometrical analysis of the sCT showed good to excellent agreement with CT. Voxelwise comparisons showed a mean absolute error of 80.05 (±6.12) HU, dice similarity coefficient (cortical bone) of 0.84 (±0.04) and structural similarity index of 0.86 (±0.02). Conclusions: This deep learning-based sCT was noninferior to conventional CT for the general visualization of bony structures of the cervical spine, artifacts, and most detailed structure assessments.
show less
Download/Full Text
The full text of this publication is not available.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence, Cervical spine, Deep learning, Image quality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Synthetic CT, Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods, Deep Learning, Artifacts, Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging, Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Journal Article, Comparative Study
ISSN: 0720-048X
Publisher: Elsevier Ireland Ltd
Note: Funding Information: This work was supported by MRIguidance BV, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Elsevier B.V. Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
(Peer reviewed)