Comparing CAR and TCR engineered T cell performance as a function of tumor cell exposure
Wachsmann, Tassilo L A; Wouters, Anne K; Remst, Dennis F G; Hagedoorn, Renate S; Meeuwsen, Miranda H; van Diest, Eline; Leusen, Jeanette; Kuball, Jürgen; Falkenburg, J H Frederik; Heemskerk, Mirjam H M
(2022) OncoImmunology, volume 11, issue 1
(Article)
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies have resulted in profound clinical responses in the treatment of CD19-positive hematological malignancies, but a significant proportion of patients do not respond or relapse eventually. As an alternative to CAR T cells, T cells can be engineered to express a tumor-targeting T cell
... read more
receptor (TCR). Due to HLA restriction of TCRs, CARs have emerged as a preferred treatment moiety when targeting surface antigens, despite the fact that functional differences between engineered TCR (eTCR) T and CAR T cells remain ill-defined. Here, we compared the activity of CAR T cells versus engineered TCR T cells in targeting the B cell malignancy-associated antigen CD20 as a function of antigen exposure. We found CAR T cells to be more potent effector cells, producing higher levels of cytokines and killing more efficiently than eTCR T cells in a short time frame. However, we revealed that the increase of antigen exposure significantly impaired CAR T cell expansion, a phenotype defined by high expression of coinhibitory molecules and effector differentiation. In contrast, eTCR T cells expanded better than CAR T cells under high antigenic pressure, with lower expression of coinhibitory molecules and maintenance of an early differentiation phenotype, and comparable clearance of tumor cells.
show less
Download/Full Text
Keywords: activation-induced cell death, antigen exposure, CAR, chimeric antigen receptor, comparison, exhaustion, solid tumors, T cell receptor, TCR, tumor load, Oncology, Immunology and Allergy, Immunology, Journal Article
ISSN: 2162-402X
Publisher: Landes Bioscience
Note: Funding Information: This project received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 721358. The authors gratefully acknowledge the Flow cytometry Core Facility (FCF) of Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) in Leiden, the Netherlands ( https://www.lumc.nl/research/facilities/fcf ), coordinated by dr. K. Schepers and M. Hameetman, run by the FCF Operators E.F.E de Haas, J.P. Jansen, D.M. Lowie, S. van de Pas, and G.IJ. Reyneveld (Directors: Prof. F.J.T. Staal and Prof. J.J.M. van Dongen) for technical support regarding flow cytometry and for cell sorting assistance. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
(Peer reviewed)