89Zr-pembrolizumab imaging as a non-invasive approach to assess clinical response to PD-1 blockade in cancer
Kok, I C; Hooiveld, J S; van de Donk, P P; Giesen, D; van der Veen, E L; Lub-de Hooge, M N; Brouwers, A H; Hiltermann, T J N; van der Wekken, A J; Hijmering-Kappelle, L B M; Timens, W; Elias, S G; Hospers, G A P; Groen, H J M; Uyterlinde, W; van der Hiel, B; Haanen, J B; de Groot, D J A; Jalving, M; de Vries, E G E
(2022) Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, volume 33, issue 1, pp. 80 - 88
(Article)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody treatment is standard of care for melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Accurately predicting which patients will benefit is currently not possible. Tumor uptake and biodistribution of the PD-1 antibody might play a role. Therefore, we carried out a positron emission tomography
... read more
(PET) imaging study with zirconium-89 (89Zr)-labeled pembrolizumab before PD-1 antibody treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced or metastatic melanoma or NSCLC received 37 MBq (1 mCi) 89Zr-pembrolizumab (∼2.5 mg antibody) intravenously plus 2.5 or 7.5 mg unlabeled pembrolizumab. After that, up to three PET scans were carried out on days 2, 4, and 7. Next, PD-1 antibody treatment was initiated. 89Zr-pembrolizumab tumor uptake was calculated as maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and expressed as geometric mean. Normal organ uptake was calculated as SUVmean and expressed as a mean. Tumor response was assessed according to (i)RECIST v1.1. RESULTS: Eighteen patients, 11 with melanoma and 7 with NSCLC, were included. The optimal dose was 5 mg pembrolizumab, and the optimal time point for PET scanning was day 7. The tumor SUVmax did not differ between melanoma and NSCLC (4.9 and 6.5, P = 0.49). Tumor 89Zr-pembrolizumab uptake correlated with tumor response (P trend = 0.014) and progression-free (P = 0.0025) and overall survival (P = 0.026). 89Zr-pembrolizumab uptake at 5 mg was highest in the spleen with a mean SUVmean of 5.8 (standard deviation ±1.8). There was also 89Zr-pembrolizumab uptake in Waldeyer's ring, in normal lymph nodes, and at sites of inflammation. CONCLUSION: 89Zr-pembrolizumab uptake in tumor lesions correlated with treatment response and patient survival. 89Zr-pembrolizumab also showed uptake in lymphoid tissues and at sites of inflammation.
show less
Download/Full Text
Keywords: PD-1, PET, Zr, immunotherapy, pembrolizumab, Hematology, Oncology
ISSN: 0923-7534
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Note: Funding Information: This work was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society Grant POINTING [grant number RUG 2016-10034] and the Innovative Medicines Initiatives2 Joint Undertaking project TRISTAN [grant number GA no. 116106]. This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program and EPFIA (no grant number). MJ reports consultancy fees from AstraZeneca (paid to UMCG). JBH reports consultancy roles for Achilles Therapeutics, BioNTech, BMS, GSK, Immunocore, Instil Bio, Molecular Partners, MSD, Merck Serono, Neogene Therapeutics, Novartis, Pfizer, PokeAcel, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, T-Knife, and Third Rock Ventures and research grants from Amgen, Asher-Bio, BMS, BioNTech, MSD, Novartis, and Neogene Therapeutics (paid to the Netherlands Cancer Institute). WT reports fees from Merck, Sharp, Dohme, and Bristol-Myers-Squibb (paid to UMCG). EGEdV reports an advisory role at Daiichi Sankyo, NSABP, and Sanofi and research funding from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Chugai Pharma, Crescendo, CytomX Therapeutics, G1 Therapeutics, Genentech, Nordic Nanovector, Radius Health, Regeneron, Roche, Servier, and Synthon (paid to UMCG). GAPH reports consulting and advisory role at Amgen, Roche, MSD, BMS, Pfizer, Novartis, and Pierre Fabry and research funding from BMS and Seerave (paid to UMCG). TJNH reports consultancy fees (paid to UMCG) from BMS, MSD, Merck, Boehringer, AstraZeneca, and Roche. AJvdW reports an advisory role at Janssen, Takeda, and Boehringer-Ingelheim (paid to UMCG) and research funding from AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda. MNL-dH reports research funding from Merck, Bayer, and Amgen (paid to UMCG). HJMG reports an advisory role at Eli Lilly, MSD, BMS, and Novartis. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Funding Information: This work was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society Grant POINTING [grant number RUG 2016-10034 ] and the Innovative Medicines Initiatives2 Joint Undertaking project TRISTAN [grant number GA no. 116106]. This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program and EPFIA (no grant number). Publisher Copyright: © 2021
(Peer reviewed)
