Detection of Neisseria meningitidis in saliva and oropharyngeal samples from college students
Miellet, Willem R.; Mariman, Rob; Pluister, Gerlinde; de Jong, Lieke J.; Grift, Ivo; Wijkstra, Stijn; van Logchem, Elske M.; van Veldhuizen, Janieke; Immink, Marie Monique; Wijmenga-Monsuur, Alienke J.; Rots, Nynke Y.; Sanders, Elisabeth A.M.; Bosch, Thijs; Trzciński, Krzysztof
(2021) Scientific Reports, volume 11, issue 1, pp. 1 - 9
(Article)
Abstract
Carriage of Neisseria meningitidis is an accepted endpoint in monitoring meningococcal vaccines effects. We have assessed N. meningitidis and vaccine-type genogroup carriage prevalence in college students at the time of MenACWY vaccine introduction in the Netherlands, and evaluated the feasibility of saliva sampling for the surveillance of carriage. For this,
... read more
paired saliva and oropharyngeal samples collected from 299 students were cultured for meningococcus. The DNA extracted from all bacterial growth was subjected to qPCRs quantifying meningococcal and genogroup-specific genes presence. Samples negative by culture yet positive for qPCR were cultured again for meningococcus. Altogether 74 (25%) of students were identified as meningococcal carrier by any method. Sixty-one students (20%) were identified as carriers with qPCR. The difference between number of qPCR-positive oropharyngeal (n = 59) and saliva (n = 52) samples was not significant (McNemar’s test, p = 0.07). Meningococci were cultured from 72 students (24%), with a significantly higher (p < 0.001) number of oropharyngeal (n = 70) compared with saliva (n = 54) samples. The prevalence of genogroups A, B, C, W, and Y was none, 9%, 1%, 1% and 6%, respectively, and 8% of students carried MenACWY vaccine-type genogroup meningococci. Saliva is easy to collect and when combined with qPCR detection can be considered for meningococcal carriage studies.
show less
Download/Full Text
Keywords: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
ISSN: 2045-2322
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
Note: Funding Information: This work was supported by internal funds from the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) and, through ZonMW, by the Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sport (VWS) and the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO). Funding Information: E.A.M.S., T.B. and K.T. had an idea and initiated the study. A.J.W.M., N.Y. and T.B. secured financial support for the project. T.B. and K.T. led the project and supervised the project activities. W.R.M., A.J.W.M., N.Y.R., T.B. and K.T. wrote the protocol. W.R.M., G.P., L.J.d.J., I.G., S.W., and J.v.V. validated the methods. W.R.M., G.P., L.J.d.J., I.G., S.W., and E.v.L. conducted the research and collected the data. W.R.M., R.M., M.M.I., A.J.W., N.Y.R., T.B. and K.T. managed the study. W.R.M., R.M., G.P., and K.T. curated the data. W.M.R., R.M. and K.T. performed formal analysis of study data. W.R.M. and K.T. visualized presentation of the results and drafted the manuscript. All authors amended, critically reviewed and commented on the final manuscript. Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).
(Peer reviewed)