The effect of meatal correction on daytime urinary incontinence in girls with an anterior deflected urinary stream

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Girls with an anterior deflected urinary stream (ADUS) are known to wet the toilet rim and their buttocks while voiding. This deviation may prevent adopting an ideal toileting position and can thus develop into a functional voiding disorder. Although surgical correction of the urinary stream by a meatotomy is part of standard care in girls with ADUS and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) at our center, little is known about the effect of this procedure on daytime urinary incontinence (DUI). OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of meatal correction on incontinence in girls with ADUS and DUI, and to find predictors for therapy success. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart study including all girls with ADUS and DUI who underwent a dorsally directed meatal correction at our tertiary referral center between 2005 and 2018 (n = 274). The main outcome measurement was continence according to the International Children's Continence Society criteria, expressed as the percentage of children that were continent at post-surgical follow-up (complete response). Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of continence. RESULTS: In 93% of girls, the direction of the urinary stream was no longer anterior deflected. 29% (n=79) of all girls were continent at post-surgical follow-up. We could not find a convincing predicting factor for achieving continence. DISCUSSION: Although meatal correction is successful on normalizing the direction of the urinary stream, less than one-third of girls became continent. In addition, we were unable to indicate which girls will profit from this procedure in terms of continence. Since not every girl with ADUS develops incontinence complaints, it may also be questionable whether ADUS and incontinence are directly related. Since other, less invasive and more effective treatment options for DUI are available, meatal correction should therefore be considered a last-resort option in the treatment of pediatric DUI in girls with ADUS. CONCLUSION: Of the 274 girls with ADUS and DUI, 29% did benefit from a meatotomy. No convincing indicator for therapy success could however be found. Therefore, we discourage a meatotomy as standard treatment in girls with ADUS and DUI.