Stress reactivity as a putative mechanism linking childhood trauma with clinical outcomes in individuals at ultra-high-risk for psychosis: Findings from the EU-GEI High Risk Study
EU-GEI High Risk Study
(2021) Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, volume 30, pp. 1 - 13
(Article)
Abstract
AIMS: Childhood trauma is associated with an elevated risk for psychosis, but the psychological mechanisms involved remain largely unclear. This study aimed to investigate emotional and psychotic stress reactivity in daily life as a putative mechanism linking childhood trauma and clinical outcomes in individuals at ultra-high-risk (UHR) for psychosis. METHODS:
... read more
Experience sampling methodology was used to measure momentary stress, affect and psychotic experiences in the daily life of N = 79 UHR individuals in the EU-GEI High Risk Study. The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire was used to assess self-reported childhood trauma. Clinical outcomes were assessed at baseline, 1- and 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: The association of stress with positive (β = -0.14, p = 0.010) and negative affect (β = 0.11, p = 0.020) was modified by transition status such that stress reactivity was greater in individuals who transitioned to psychosis. Moreover, the association of stress with negative affect (β = 0.06, p = 0.019) and psychotic experiences (β = 0.05, p = 0.037) was greater in individuals exposed to high v. low levels of childhood trauma. We also found evidence that decreased positive affect in response to stress was associated with reduced functioning at 1-year follow-up (B = 6.29, p = 0.034). In addition, there was evidence that the association of childhood trauma with poor functional outcomes was mediated by stress reactivity (e.g. indirect effect: B = -2.13, p = 0.026), but no evidence that stress reactivity mediated the association between childhood trauma and transition (e.g. indirect effect: B = 0.14, p = 0.506). CONCLUSIONS: Emotional and psychotic stress reactivity may be potential mechanisms linking childhood trauma with clinical outcomes in UHR individuals.
show less
Download/Full Text
Keywords: At-risk mental state, Childhood abuse, Ecological momentary assessment (EMA), Experience sampling method (ESM), Stress sensitization, Transition, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health
ISSN: 2045-7960
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Note: Funding Information: Financial support. This study was supported by the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (grant number HEALTH-F2-2009-241909, Funding Information: This study was supported by the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (grant number HEALTH-F2-2009-241909, Project EU-GEI), the Wellcome Trust (grant number WT087417) to CM, a Postdoctoral Research Fellowship of the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (grant number NIHR-PDF-201104065), a Medical Research Council Fellowship to MK (grant number MR/J008915/1), the Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and a Heisenberg professorship from the German Research Foundation (grant number 389624707) to UR. Funding Information: Project EU-GEI), the Wellcome Trust (grant number WT087417) to CM, a Postdoctoral Research Fellowship of the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (grant number NIHR-PDF-201104065), a Medical Research Council Fellowship to MK (grant number MR/J008915/1), the Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and a Heisenberg professorship from the German Research Foundation (grant number 389624707) to UR. Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
(Peer reviewed)