The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Research Priorities for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Critical Illness
Coopersmith, Craig M; Antonelli, Massimo; Bauer, Seth R; Deutschman, Clifford S; Evans, Laura E; Ferrer, Ricard; Hellman, Judith; Jog, Sameer; Kesecioglu, Jozef; Kissoon, Niranjan; Martin-Loeches, Ignacio; Nunnally, Mark E; Prescott, Hallie C; Rhodes, Andrew; Talmor, Daniel; Tissieres, Pierre; De Backer, Daniel
(2021) Critical care medicine, volume 49, issue 4, pp. 598 - 622
(Article)
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To identify research priorities in the management, pathophysiology, and host response of coronavirus disease 2019 in critically ill patients. DESIGN: The Surviving Sepsis Research Committee, a multiprofessional group of 17 international experts representing the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Society of Critical Care Medicine, was virtually convened
... read more
during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The committee iteratively developed the recommendations and subsequent document. METHODS: Each committee member submitted a list of what they believed were the most important priorities for coronavirus disease 2019 research. The entire committee voted on 58 submitted questions to determine top priorities for coronavirus disease 2019 research. RESULTS: The Surviving Sepsis Research Committee provides 13 priorities for coronavirus disease 2019. Of these, the top six priorities were identified and include the following questions: 1) Should the approach to ventilator management differ from the standard approach in patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure?, 2) Can the host response be modulated for therapeutic benefit?, 3) What specific cells are directly targeted by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, and how do these cells respond?, 4) Can early data be used to predict outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 and, by extension, to guide therapies?, 5) What is the role of prone positioning and noninvasive ventilation in nonventilated patients with coronavirus disease?, and 6) Which interventions are best to use for viral load modulation and when should they be given? CONCLUSIONS: Although knowledge of both biology and treatment has increased exponentially in the first year of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, significant knowledge gaps remain. The research priorities identified represent a roadmap for investigation in coronavirus disease 2019.
show less
Download/Full Text
The full text of this publication is not available.
Keywords: Surviving Sepsis Campaign, coronavirus disease 2019, critical illness, intensive care unit, priorities, research, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
ISSN: 0090-3493
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Note: Funding Information: Funding for the research priorities was provided solely by Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). No outside funding was received. Funding Information: Dr. Coopersmith is past president of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Dr. Antonelli is immediate past president of European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and received consulting fees from Toray, Intersurgical, and Fisher & Paykel and unrestricted research grants from GE and Estor. Dr. Bauer is a consultant for Wolters Kluwer, and he received funding from Wolters Kluwer. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
(Peer reviewed)