Variation in breast cancer grading: the effect of creating awareness through laboratory-specific and pathologist-specific feedback reports in 16 734 patients with breast cancer
van Dooijeweert, Carmen; van Diest, Paul J; Baas, Inge O; van der Wall, Elsken; Deckers, Ivette A
(2020) Journal of Clinical Pathology, volume 73, issue 12, pp. 793 - 799
(Article)
Abstract
AIMS: Histological grade is widely used to guide the management of invasive breast cancer (IBC). Yet, substantial interlaboratory and intralaboratory grading variations exist in daily pathology practice. To create awareness and to facilitate quality improvement, feedback reports, containing case-mix-adjusted laboratory-specific grades benchmarked against other laboratories, were sent to the individual
... read more
laboratories by 1 March 2018. We studied the effect of these feedback reports on interlaboratory grading variation up till 1 year later. METHODS: Overall, 17 102 synoptic pathology reports of IBC resection specimens from 33 laboratories, obtained between 1 March 2017 and 1 March 2019 were retrieved from the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA). An overall deviation score (ODS), representing the sum of deviations from the grade-specific overall proportions, was calculated to compare the absolute deviation for all grades at once. Case-mix correction was performed by two multivariable logistic regression analyses, providing laboratory-specific ORs for high-grade versus low-grade IBC. RESULTS: After feedback, the overall range between laboratories decreased by 3.8%, 6.4% and 6.6% for grades I, II and III, respectively. Though the mean ODS remained similar (13.8% vs 13.7%), the maximum ODS decreased from 34.1% to 29.4%. The range of laboratory-specific ORs decreased by 21.9% for grade III versus grades I-II. CONCLUSIONS: An encouraging decrease in grading variation of IBC was observed after laboratory-specific feedback. Nevertheless, the overall grading variation remains substantial. In view of the important role of grading in patient management, it is adamant that not only feedback should be provided on a regular basis but also other interventions, such as additional training, are required.
show less
Download/Full Text
The full text of this publication is not available.
Keywords: Breast Neoplasms/pathology, Female, Humans, Laboratories/standards, Neoplasm Grading/standards, Netherlands, Pathologists/standards, Pathology, Surgical/standards, Quality Assurance, Health Care, breast pathology, histopathology, breast cancer, oncology, epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Journal Article
ISSN: 0021-9746
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
Note: Funding Information: Funding This research was funded by the Quality Foundation of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists (SKMS). Publisher Copyright: © Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
(Peer reviewed)