Patients’ perceptions of 70-gene signature testing: commonly changing the initial inclination to undergo or forego chemotherapy and reducing decisional conflict
van Steenhoven, Julia E.C.; den Dekker, Bianca M.; Kuijer, Anne; van Diest, Paul J.; Nieboer, Peter; Zuetenhorst, Johanna M.; Imholz, Alex L.Th; Siesling, Sabine; van Dalen, Thijs
(2020) Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, volume 182, issue 1, pp. 107 - 115
(Article)
Abstract
PURPOSE: Little is known about the impact of 70-gene signature (70-GS) use on patients' chemotherapy decision-making. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of 70-GS use on patients' decisions to undergo chemotherapy. The perceived decision conflict during decision-making was a secondary objective of the study. METHODS:
... read more
Patients operated for estrogen receptor positive early breast cancer were asked to fill out a questionnaire probing their inclination to undergo chemotherapy before deployment of the 70-GS test. After disclosure of the 70-GS result patients were asked about their decision regarding chemotherapy. Patients' decisional conflict was measured using the 16-item decisional conflict scale (DCS); scores < 25 are associated with a persuaded decision while a score > 37.5 implies that one feels unsure about a choice. RESULTS: Between January 1th 2017 and December 31th 2018, 106 patients completed both questionnaires. Before deployment of the 70-GS, 58% of patients (n = 62) formulated a clear treatment preference, of whom 21 patients (34%) changed their opinion on treatment with chemotherapy following the 70-GS. The final decision regarding chemotherapy was in line with the 70-GS result in 90% of patients. The percentage of patients who felt unsure about their preference to be treated with chemotherapy decreased from 42 to 5% after disclosure of the 70-GS. The mean total DCS significantly decreased from pre-test to post-test from 35 to 23, irrespective of the risk estimate (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Deployment of the 70-GS changed patients' inclination to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy in one third of patients and decreased patients' decisional conflict.
show less
Download/Full Text
Keywords: Breast cancer, Chemotherapy, Decision-making, Decisional conflict, Gene-expression profiling, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Gene Expression Profiling, Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics, Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism, Adult, Female, Surveys and Questionnaires, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy, Conflict, Psychological, Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism, Decision Making, Choice Behavior, Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology, Decision Support Techniques, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use, Perception, Aged, Oncology, Cancer Research, Journal Article
ISSN: 0167-6806
Publisher: Springer New York
Note: Funding Information: We thank all patients for participation in this study. We also thank all of the principal investigators and the participating hospitals for their collaboration: P. Nieboer (Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Assen), S. Hovenga (Ziekenhuis Nij Smellighe, Drachten), H. Zuetenhorst (St. Franciscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam), H. Rijna (Spaarne Ziekenhuis, Hoofddorp), Q. van Rossum (Franciscus Vlietland, Schiedam), M.W.A. van Tilburg (Sint Jansdal, Harderwijk), A. van der Pas (LangeLand Ziekenhuis, Zoetermeer), J. de Boer (Tjongerschans, Heerenveen), T. van Dalen (Diakonessenhuis Utrecht). Publisher Copyright: © 2020, The Author(s).
(Peer reviewed)