Blood metal levels and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis risk: a prospective cohort
Peters, Susan; Broberg, Karin; Gallo, Valentina; Levi, Michael; Kippler, Maria; Vineis, Paolo; Veldink, Jan; van den Berg, Leonard; Middleton, Lefkos; Travis, Ruth C; Bergmann, Manuela M; Palli, Domenico; Grioni, Sara; Tumino, Rosario; Elbaz, Alexis; Vlaar, Tim; Mancini, Francesca; Kühn, Tilman; Katzke, Verena; Agudo, Antonio; Goñi, Fernando; Gómez, Jesús-Humberto; Rodríguez-Barranco, Miguel; Merino, Susana; Barricarte, Aurelio; Trichopoulou, Antonia; Jenab, Mazda; Weiderpass, Elisabete; Vermeulen, Roel
(2021) Annals of Neurology, volume 89, issue 1, pp. 125 - 133
(Article)
Abstract
Objective: Metals have been suggested as a risk factor for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), but only retrospective studies are available to date. We compared metal levels in prospectively collected blood samples from ALS patients and controls, to explore whether metals are associated with ALS mortality. Methods: A nested ALS case–control
... read more
study was conducted within the prospective EPIC (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition) cohort. Cases were identified through death certificates. We analyzed metal levels in erythrocyte samples obtained at recruitment, as a biomarker for metal exposure from any source. Arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, manganese, mercury, selenium, and zinc concentrations were measured by inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry. To estimate ALS risk, we applied conditional logistic regression models. Results: The study population comprised 107 cases (65% female) and 319 controls matched for age, sex, and study center. Median time between blood collection and ALS death was 8 years (range = 1–15). Comparing the highest with the lowest tertile, cadmium (odds ratio [OR] = 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08–3.87) and lead (OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 0.97–3.67) concentrations suggest associations with increased ALS risk. Zinc was associated with a decreased risk (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.27–0.94). Associations for cadmium and lead remained when limiting analyses to noncurrent smokers. Interpretation: This is the first study to compare metal levels before disease onset, minimizing reverse causation. The observed associations suggest that cadmium, lead, and zinc may play a role in ALS etiology. Cadmium and lead possibly act as intermediates on the pathway from smoking to ALS. ANN NEUROL 20209999:n/a–n/a.
show less
Download/Full Text
Keywords: Clinical Neurology, Neurology, Journal Article
ISSN: 0364-5134
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Note: Funding Information: The EPIC study is funded by a number of grants; however, no funding source had any role in the preparation of this article. The EPIC study was funded by the Europe against Cancer program of the European Commission (SANCO), Italian Association for Research on Cancer, and Italian National Research Council. In addition, the authors thank the following for their financial support: the Environmental Cancer Risk, Nutrition, and Individual Susceptibility Network of Excellence, operating within the European Union Sixth Framework Program, Priority 5: Food Quality and Safety (FOOD-CT-2005-513943); European Community Fifth Framework Program (grant QLK4CT199900927); ISCIII, Red de Centros RCESP (C03/09); Deutsche Krebshilfe; Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum; German Federal Ministry of Education and Research; Danish Cancer Society; Health Research Fund of the Spanish Ministry of Health; Spanish Regional Governments of Andalucia, Asturias, Basque Country, Murcia, and Navarra; Cancer Research UK; Medical Research Council, UK; Stroke Association, UK; British Heart Foundation; Department of Health, UK; Food Standards Agency, UK; Wellcome Trust, UK; Greek Ministry of Health; Greek Ministry of Education; Italian Association for Research on Cancer; Italian National Research Council; Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare, and Sports; Netherlands Cancer Registry; LK Research Funds; Dutch Prevention Funds, Zorg Onderzoek Nederland; World Cancer Research Fund; Statistics Netherlands; Swedish Cancer; Swedish Scientific Council; Regional Government of Skåne and Västerbotten, Sweden; Norwegian Cancer Society; Research Council of Norway; French League against Cancer; INSERM; Mutuelle Generale l'Education National; and IGR. The EPIC-Norfolk study (DOI 10.22025/2019.10.105.00004) has received funding from the Medical Research Council (MR/N003284/1 and MC-UU_12015/1) and Cancer Research UK (C864/A14136). We thank all the participants who have been part of the project; the many members of the study teams at the University of Cambridge who have enabled this research; the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands, for their contribution and ongoing support to the EPIC Study; and the Karolinska Institute, Sweden. Where authors are identified as personnel of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization, the authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article, and they do not necessarily represent the decisions, policy, or views of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization. Funding Information: The EPIC study is funded by a number of grants; however, no funding source had any role in the preparation of this article. The EPIC study was funded by the Europe against Cancer program of the European Commission (SANCO), Italian Association for Research on Cancer, and Italian National Research Council. In addition, the authors thank the following for their financial support: the Environmental Cancer Risk, Nutrition, and Individual Susceptibility Network of Excellence, operating within the European Union Sixth Framework Program, Priority 5: Food Quality and Safety (FOOD‐CT‐2005‐513943); European Community Fifth Framework Program (grant QLK4CT199900927); ISCIII, Red de Centros RCESP (C03/09); Deutsche Krebshilfe; Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum; German Federal Ministry of Education and Research; Danish Cancer Society; Health Research Fund of the Spanish Ministry of Health; Spanish Regional Governments of Andalucia, Asturias, Basque Country, Murcia, and Navarra; Cancer Research UK; Medical Research Council, UK; Stroke Association, UK; British Heart Foundation; Department of Health, UK; Food Standards Agency, UK; Wellcome Trust, UK; Greek Ministry of Health; Greek Ministry of Education; Italian Association for Research on Cancer; Italian National Research Council; Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare, and Sports; Netherlands Cancer Registry; LK Research Funds; Dutch Prevention Funds, Zorg Onderzoek Nederland; World Cancer Research Fund; Statistics Netherlands; Swedish Cancer; Swedish Scientific Council; Regional Government of Skåne and Västerbotten, Sweden; Norwegian Cancer Society; Research Council of Norway; French League against Cancer; INSERM; Mutuelle Generale l'Education National; and IGR. The EPIC‐Norfolk study (DOI 10.22025/2019.10.105.00004) has received funding from the Medical Research Council (MR/N003284/1 and MC‐UU_12015/1) and Cancer Research UK (C864/A14136). Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.
(Peer reviewed)