Recurrence of idiopathic acute pancreatitis after cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis
Umans, D. S.; Hallensleben, N. D.; Verdonk, R. C.; Bouwense, S. A. W.; Fockens, P.; van Santvoort, H. C.; Voermans, R. P.; Besselink, M. G.; Bruno, M. J.; van Hooft, J. E.
(2020) British Journal of Surgery, volume 107, issue 3, pp. 191 - 199
(Article)
Abstract
Background: Occult biliary disease has been suggested as a frequent underlying cause of idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP). Cholecystectomy has been proposed as a strategy to prevent recurrent IAP. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the efficacy of cholecystectomy in reducing the risk of recurrent IAP. Methods: PubMed,
... read more
Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched systematically for studies including patients with IAP treated by cholecystectomy, with data on recurrence of pancreatitis. Studies published before 1980 or including chronic pancreatitis and case reports were excluded. The primary outcome was recurrence rate. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Meta-analyses were undertaken to calculate risk ratios using a random-effects model with the inverse-variance method. Results: Overall, ten studies were included, of which nine were used in pooled analyses. The study population consisted of 524 patients with 126 cholecystectomies. Of these 524 patients, 154 (29·4 (95 per cent c.i. 25·5 to 33·3) per cent) had recurrent disease. The recurrence rate was significantly lower after cholecystectomy than after conservative management (14 of 126 (11·1 per cent) versus 140 of 398 (35·2 per cent); risk ratio 0·44, 95 per cent c.i. 0·27 to 0·71). Even in patients in whom IAP was diagnosed after more extensive diagnostic testing, including endoscopic ultrasonography or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, the recurrence rate appeared to be lower after cholecystectomy (4 of 36 (11 per cent) versus 42 of 108 (38·9 per cent); risk ratio 0·41, 0·16 to 1·07). Conclusion: Cholecystectomy after an episode of IAP reduces the risk of recurrent pancreatitis. This implies that current diagnostics are insufficient to exclude a biliary cause.
show less
Download/Full Text
Keywords: Acute Disease, Cholecystectomy/adverse effects, Humans, Pancreatitis/etiology, Postoperative Complications, Recurrence, Surgery, Meta-Analysis, Journal Article
ISSN: 0007-1323
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Note: Funding Information: The authors thank F. S. van Etten-Jamaludin for support in creating an adequate search strategy. R.P.V. is a consultant and received a grant for an investigator-initiated study from Boston Scientific. M.J.B. is a consultant and lecturer for, and received financial support for industry- and investigator-initiated studies from, Boston Scientific, Cook Medical and Pentax Medical; a lecturer for and received financial support for investigator-initiated studies from 3M; a consultant for Mylan, MediRisk and Medicom; and a lecturer for GastroUpdate. J.E.v.H. received grants from Cook Medical and Medtronics, and is a consultant for Boston Scientific and Abbott. Disclosure: The authors declare no other conflict of interest. Funding Information: The authors thank F. S. van Etten‐Jamaludin for support in creating an adequate search strategy. R.P.V. is a consultant and received a grant for an investigator‐initiated study from Boston Scientific. M.J.B. is a consultant and lecturer for, and received financial support for industry‐ and investigator‐initiated studies from, Boston Scientific, Cook Medical and Pentax Medical; a lecturer for and received financial support for investigator‐initiated studies from 3M; a consultant for Mylan, MediRisk and Medicom; and a lecturer for GastroUpdate. J.E.v.H. received grants from Cook Medical and Medtronics, and is a consultant for Boston Scientific and Abbott. Publisher Copyright: © 2019 The Authors. BJS published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.
(Peer reviewed)