Effectiveness of a stepwise cardiometabolic disease prevention program: Results of a randomized controlled trial in primary care
Stol, Daphne M; Badenbroek, Ilse F; Hollander, Monika; Nielen, Mark M J; Kraaijenhagen, Roderik A; Schellevis, François G; de Wit, Niek J
(2020) Preventive Medicine, volume 132
(Article)
Abstract
Effective preventive strategies for cardiometabolic disease (CMD) are needed. We aim to establish the effectiveness of a stepwise CMD risk assessment followed by individualized treatment if indicated compared to care as usual. We conducted a RCT between 2014 and 2017. Individuals (45-70 years) without CMD or CMD risk factors were invited
... read more
for stepwise CMD risk assessment through a risk score (step1), additional risk assessment at the practice in case of high-risk (step2) and individualized follow-up treatment if indicated (step3). We compared newly detected CMD and newly prescribed drugs during one-year follow-up, and change in CMD risk profile between baseline and one-year follow-up among participants who completed step2 to matched controls. A CMD was diagnosed almost three times more often (OR 2.90, 95% CI 2.25: 3.72) in the intervention compared to the control group, in parallel with newly prescribed antihypertensive and lipid lowering drugs (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.96: 4.15 and 3.23, 95% CI 2.03: 5.14 respectively). Waist circumference significantly decreased between the intervention compared to the control group (mean -3.08 cm, 95% CI -3.73: -2.43). No differences were observed for changes in BMI and smoking. Systolic blood pressure (mean -2.26 mmHg, 95% CI -4.01: -0.51) and cholesterol ratio (mean -0.11, 95% CI -0.19: -0.02) significantly decreased within intervention participants between baseline and one-year follow-up. In conclusion, implementation of the CMD prevention program resulted in the detection of two- to threefold more patients with CMD. A significant drop in systolic blood pressure and cholesterol levels was found after one year of treatment. Modelling of these results should confirm the effect on long term endpoints. Trial registration: Dutch trial Register number NTR4277.
show less
Download/Full Text
Keywords: Cardiovascular diseases, Diabetes mellitus, General practitioners, Prevention, Primary health care, Randomized controlled trial, Risk assessment, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, Journal Article
ISSN: 0091-7435
Publisher: Academic Press Inc.
Note: Funding Information: This work was supported by ZonMw (The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development) under grant number 50-51515-98-192 ; Lekker Lang Leven (a collaboration of the Dutch Diabetes Research Foundation , the Dutch Heart Foundation and the Dutch Kidney Foundation ) under grant number 2012.20.1595 ; and Innovatiefonds Zorgverzekeraars (Healthcare Insurance Innovation Fund) under grant number 2582 . The sponsors played no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. Funding Information: The authors thank NIPED Institute and the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL) for the contribution to data management. N.P.A. Zuithoff is acknowledged for his statistical advice. This work was supported by ZonMw (The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development) under grant number 50-51515-98-192; Lekker Lang Leven (a collaboration of the Dutch Diabetes Research Foundation, the Dutch Heart Foundation and the Dutch Kidney Foundation) under grant number 2012.20.1595; and Innovatiefonds Zorgverzekeraars (Healthcare Insurance Innovation Fund) under grant number 2582. The sponsors played no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Authors
(Peer reviewed)