Mobile monitoring of air pollutants; performance evaluation of a mixed-model land use regression framework in relation to the number of drive days

Abstract

We used black carbon data from a mobile monitoring campaign in Oakland, USA measuring street segments up to 40 times and compared a data-only, LUR model and mixed-model approach with a long-term average, represented by the average concentration based on 40 drive days on that street segment. The mixed model outperformed the data-only and LUR model estimates, with 80% explained variance after 5 drive days and 90% after 14 drive days. The data-only approach needed 8 and 15 to achieve an explained variance of 80% and 90%, respectively, The LUR model never achieved an explained variance higher than 70%. The mixed model is a scalable approach, as it can be used before all street segments in a domain are measured by developing a LUR model and adds information with increasing repeats per street segment.