Cumulative Occupational Exposures and Lung Function Decline in Two Large General Population Cohorts
Lytras, Theodore; Beckmeyer-Borowko, Anna; Kogevinas, Manolis; Kromhout, Hans; Carsin, Anne-Elie; Antó, Josep Maria; Bentouhami, Hayat; Weyler, Joost; Heinrich, Joachim; Nowak, Dennis; Urrutia, Isabel; Martínez-Moratalla, Jesús; Gullón, José Antonio; Pereira Vega, Antonio; Raherison Semjen, Chantal; Pin, Isabelle; Demoly, Pascal; Leynaert, Bénédicte; Villani, Simona; Gislason, Thorarinn; Svanes, Øistein; Holm, Mathias; Forsberg, Bertil; Norbäck, Dan; Mehta, Amar J; Keidel, Dirk; Vernez, David; Benke, Geza; Jõgi, Rain; Torén, Kjell; Sigsgaard, Torben; Schlünssen, Vivi; Olivieri, Mario; Blanc, Paul D; Watkins, John; Bono, Roberto; Squillacioti, Giulia; Buist, A Sonia; Vermeulen, Roel; Jarvis, Deborah; Probst-Hensch, Nicole; Zock, Jan-Paul
(2021) Annals of the American Thoracic Society, volume 18, issue 2, pp. 238 - 246
(Article)
Abstract
RATIONALE: Few longitudinal studies have assessed the relationship between occupational exposures and lung function decline in the general population, with sufficiently long follow-up. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to examine this potential association in two large cohorts (ECRHS and SAPALDIA). METHODS: General population samples aged 18 to 62 were randomly selected
... read more
in 1991-1993, and followed up approximately 10 and 20 years later. Spirometry (without bronchodilation) was performed at each visit. Coded complete job histories during follow-up visits were linked to a Job-Exposure Matrix, generating cumulative exposure estimates for 12 occupational exposures. FEV1 and FVC were jointly modelled in linear mixed-effects models, fitted in a Bayesian framework, taking into account age and smoking. RESULTS: A total of 40,024 lung function measurements from 17,833 study participants were analyzed. We found accelerated declines in FEV1 and the FEV1/FVC ratio for exposure to biological dust, mineral dust and metals (FEV1 -15.1ml, -14.4ml and -18.7ml respectively, and FEV1/FVC -0.52%, -0.43% and -0.36% respectively, per 25 intensity-years of exposure). These declines were comparable in magnitude to those associated with long-term smoking. No effect modification by sex or smoking status was identified. Findings were similar between the ECRHS and SAPALDIA cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Our results greatly strengthen the evidence base implicating occupation, independent of smoking, as a risk factor for lung function decline. This highlights the need to prevent or control these exposures in the workplace.
show less
Download/Full Text
Keywords: spirometry, lung function, occupational exposure, occupational disease, longitudinal studies, Taverne
ISSN: 2325-6621
Publisher: American Thoracic Society
(Peer reviewed)