Reflective and decisive supervision: The role of participative leadership and team climate in joint decision-making

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Reflective and decisive supervision: The role of participative leadership and team climate in joint decision-making
 
Coffeng, Tessa; van Steenbergen, Elianne; de Vries, Femke; Steffens, Niklas K.; Ellemers, Naomi
(2023) Regulation & Governance, volume 17, issue 1, pp. 290 - 309
(Article)
Abstract
Supervisory bodies can intervene in organizational practices that may harm society, but their effectiveness to do so depends on their ability to make decisions reflectively and decisively. Are these tendencies incompatible with each other or can they go together? Can empowering leadership (i.e. participative, coaching, informing behaviors) stimulate reflectiveness and ... read more
Download/Full Text
Open Access version via Utrecht University Repository Publisher version
 
Keywords: COVID-19, cooperative trust, decision-making, goal commitment, participative leadership, Sociology and Political Science, Public Administration, Law
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12449
ISSN: 1748-5991
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Note: Funding Information: This research was made possible by an NWO-Spinoza Prize awarded to the fifth author, and by the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) that funded 20 percent of the overall research project on “correcting for bias in supervision.” There has not been any involvement of funders in the entire research process, from study design to submission. The authors thank Frederique Romeyn and Annelies Compagner for their assistance in collecting data for the current research. The authors also thank Floor Rink, Melanie de Waal, and Wiebren Jansen for their valuable comments on previous versions of this manuscript. This manuscript was in an earlier stage presented by the first author at the Dutch Society of Work and Organisational Psychology (WAOP) Conference 2017, and the ECPR Standing Group on Regulatory Governance Conference 2018. Funding Information: This research was made possible by an NWO‐Spinoza Prize awarded to the fifth author, and by the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) that funded 20 percent of the overall research project on “correcting for bias in supervision.” There has not been any involvement of funders in the entire research process, from study design to submission. The authors thank Frederique Romeyn and Annelies Compagner for their assistance in collecting data for the current research. The authors also thank Floor Rink, Melanie de Waal, and Wiebren Jansen for their valuable comments on previous versions of this manuscript. This manuscript was in an earlier stage presented by the first author at the Dutch Society of Work and Organisational Psychology (WAOP) Conference 2017, and the ECPR Standing Group on Regulatory Governance Conference 2018. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors. Regulation & Governance published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
(Peer reviewed)
 
 
See more statistics about this item