Two notes on Axiological Futurism: The importance of disagreement and methodological implications for value theory

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Two notes on Axiological Futurism: The importance of disagreement and methodological implications for value theory
 
Lundgren, Björn
(2023) Futures, volume 147
(Article)
Abstract
Recently, John Danaher defended a research agenda he calls “Axiological Futurism”. In this commentary, I propose two revisions for how that research agenda is defined. I argue that it ought to focus on disagreements and comparison of different axiologies.
Download/Full Text
Open Access version via Utrecht University Repository Publisher version
 
Keywords: Axiological Futurism, Axiology, Disagreement, Value theory, General Social Sciences, Development, Business and International Management, General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2023.103120
ISSN: 0016-3287
Publisher: Elsevier Limited
Note: Funding Information: This work is part of the research programme Ethics of Socially Disruptive Technologies, which is funded through the Gravitation programme of the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO grant number 024.004.031 ). Funding Information: I'm grateful to comments from John Danaher, Sven Nyholm, and two reviewers. Any faults are mine alone. This work is part of the research programme Ethics of Socially Disruptive Technologies, which is funded through the Gravitation programme of the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO grant number 024.004.031). Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors
(Peer reviewed)
 
 
See more statistics about this item