Large Methane Emissions From the Pantanal During Rising Water-Levels Revealed by Regularly Measured Lower Troposphere CH4 Profiles
Gloor, M.; Gatti, L. V.; Wilson, C.; Parker, R. J.; Boesch, H.; Popa, E.; Chipperfield, M. P.; Poulter, B.; Zhang, Z.; Basso, L.; Miller, J.; McNorton, J.; Jimenez, C.; Prigent, C.
(2021) Global Biogeochemical Cycles, volume 35, issue 10, pp. 1 - 14
(Article)
Abstract
The Pantanal region of Brazil is the largest seasonally flooded tropical grassland and, according to local chamber measurements, a substantial CH4 source. CH4 emissions from wetlands have recently become of heightened interest because global atmospheric 13CH4 data indicate they may contribute to the resumption of atmospheric CH4 growth since 2007.
... read more
We have regularly measured vertical atmospheric profiles for 2 years in the center of the Pantanal with the objectives to obtain an estimate of CH4 emissions using an atmospheric approach, and provide information about flux seasonality and its relation to controlling factors. Boundary layer-free troposphere differences observed in the Pantanal are large compared to other wetlands. Total emissions based on a planetary boundary layer budgeting technique are 2.0–2.8 TgCH4 yr−1 (maximum flux ∼0.4 gCH4 m−2 d−1) while those based on a Bayesian inversion using an atmospheric transport model are ∼3.3 TgCH4 yr−1. Compared to recent estimates for Amazonia (∼41 ± 3 TgCH4 yr−1, maximum flux ∼0.3 gCH4 m−2 d−1) these emissions are not that large. Our Pantanal data suggest a clear flux seasonality with CH4 being released in large amounts just after water levels begin to rise again after minimum levels have been reached. CH4 emissions decline substantially once the maximum water level has been reached. While predictions with prognostic wetland CH4 emission models agree well with the magnitude of the fluxes, they disagree with the phasing. Our approach shows promise for detecting and understanding longer-term trends in CH4 emissions and the potential for future wetlands CH4 emissions climate feedbacks.
show less
Download/Full Text
Keywords: climate feedback, seasonally flooded savannah, Pantanal, atmospheric methane, wetlands, Taverne, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Chemistry, General Environmental Science, Atmospheric Science
ISSN: 0886-6236
Publisher: American Geophysical Union
Note: Funding Information: We thank John Melack for an insightful and helpful review. We also thank data providers for this study which include the Brazilian hydrological service, the AQUA, TERRA, and GOSAT remote sensing missions. The GOSAT data were provided the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency, National Institute for Environmental Studies and the Ministry of Environment for the GOSAT. We also thank the ALICE High Performance Computing Facility at the University of Leicester for the GOSAT retrievals. We thank Bruno l'Advocaat for help with obtaining river discharge data and Euan Nisbet for leading the NERC MOYA CH4 consortium from which this study has arisen. Funding for CW, MPC, LVG, LB, and EG has come from MOYA NERC Grant NE/N015657/1, NCEO, and CSSP Brazil. RJP and HB are funded via the UK National Centre for Earth Observation (NE/R016518/1 and NE/N018079/1). LSB is funded by FAPESP (2018/14006-4 and 2019/23654-2). We also acknowledge funding from the ESA GHG-CCI and Copernicus C3S projects. Funding Information: We thank John Melack for an insightful and helpful review. We also thank data providers for this study which include the Brazilian hydrological service, the AQUA, TERRA, and GOSAT remote sensing missions. The GOSAT data were provided the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency, National Institute for Environmental Studies and the Ministry of Environment for the GOSAT. We also thank the ALICE High Performance Computing Facility at the University of Leicester for the GOSAT retrievals. We thank Bruno l'Advocaat for help with obtaining river discharge data and Euan Nisbet for leading the NERC MOYA CH consortium from which this study has arisen. Funding for CW, MPC, LVG, LB, and EG has come from MOYA NERC Grant NE/N015657/1, NCEO, and CSSP Brazil. RJP and HB are funded via the UK National Centre for Earth Observation (NE/R016518/1 and NE/N018079/1). LSB is funded by FAPESP (2018/14006‐4 and 2019/23654‐2). We also acknowledge funding from the ESA GHG‐CCI and Copernicus C3S projects. 4 Publisher Copyright: © 2021. The Authors.
(Peer reviewed)