Paleomagnetic and Chronologic Data Bearing on the Permian/Triassic Boundary Position of Qamdo in the Eastern Qiantang Terrane: Implications for the Closure of the Paleo‐Tethys
Guan, Chong; Yan, Maodu; Zhang, Weilin; Zhang, Dawen; Fu, Qiang; Yu, Liang; Xu, Wanlong; Zan, Jinbo; Li, Bingshuai; Zhang, Tao; Shen, Miaomiao
(2021) Geophysical Research Letters, volume 48, issue 6
(Article)
Abstract
The tectonic evolution of the eastern Paleo-Tethys in the Three-Rivers headwater region remains uncertain, especially because of the lack of quality paleomagnetic data from the east Eastern Qiangtang Terrane (EQT). Here, we present an integrated paleomagnetic and zircon U-Pb geochronologic study of the Gadikao Formation (Fm.) volcanic rocks in the
... read more
EQT. This previously assumed Carboniferous or Permian rock unit is now zircon U-Pb dated to ∼254–248 Ma. Our new high quality (29 sites and 257 samples) inferred primary paleomagnetic results yield a robust Permo-Triassic boundary paleopole of 59.7°N and 228.2°E (A95 = 3.3°), with a paleolatitude of 10.0 ± 3.3°N for the study area. Integrated with other reliable Permo-Triassic paleomagnetic data of the EQT and the Tarim Block and other lines of geologic evidence, we propose that the EQT drifted continuously northward during 300–200 Ma and the Paleo-Tethys Ocean probably closed at ∼232–220 Ma around the Qamdo region, most likely at 230 Ma.
show less
Download/Full Text
The full text of this publication is not available.
Keywords: Eastern Paleo-Tethys Ocean, Permo-Triassic boundary, Qamdo, Qiangtang-Tarim collision, paleomagnetism, Geophysics, Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
ISSN: 0094-8276
Publisher: Wiley Online Library
Note: Funding Information: This research was supported by the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition Program (Grant 2019QZKK0707), the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant 2017YFC0602803), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS, China (Grant 2016071), and the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 41988101‐01, 41974080, 41172032, 41877298, 41804065 and 41907263). Mengqi Tan, Ziqiang Mao, Zhenyu Li, Peiping Song, Yong Cao, Mei Sheng, Yuhang Cai, Mengmeng Xia, Zhantao Feng, Yi Chen and Zhongyu Xiong are thanked for their assistance with the laboratory work and data processing. Prof. John Geissman and an anonymous reviewer are also thanked for their constructive comments and suggestions and Prof. Zhiming Sun is thanked for his helpful discussion, both of which improved this paper. Publisher Copyright: © 2021. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
(Peer reviewed)