Red blood cell fatty acids and risk of colorectal cancer in the European Prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC)
Linseisen, J.; Grundmann, N.; Zoller, D.; Kuhn, T.; Chajes, V.; Fedirko, V.; Weiderpass, E.; Dahm, C.C.; Overvad, K.; Tjønneland, A.; Boutron-Ruault, M.-C.; Rothwell, J.A.; Severi, G.; Kaaks, R.; Schulze, M.B.; Aleksandrova, K.; Sieri, S.; Panico, S.; Tumino, R.; Masala, G.; de Marco, L.; Bueno-De-Mesquita, B.; Vermeulen, R.; Gram, I.T.; Skeie, G.; Chirlaque, M.-D.; Ardanaz, E.; Agudo, A.; Sánchez, M.-J.; Amiano, P.; Wennberg, M.; Bodén, S.; Perez-Cornago, A.; Aglago, E.K.; Gunter, M.J.; Jenab, M.; Heath, A.K.; Nieters, A.
(2021) Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, volume 30, issue 5, pp. 874 - 885
(Article)
Abstract
Background: A growing body of evidence suggests that alterations of dietary fatty acid (FA) profiles are associated with colorectal cancer risk. However, data from large-scale epidemiologic studies using circulating FA measurements to objectively assess individual FA and FA categories are scarce. Methods: We investigate the association between red blood cell
... read more
(RBC) membrane FAs and risk of colorectal cancer in a case–control study nested within a large prospective cohort. After a median follow-up of 6.4 years, 1,069 incident colorectal cancer cases were identified and matched to 1,069 controls among participants of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). The FA composition of RBC phospholipids (in mol%) was analyzed by gas chromatography, and their association with risk of colorectal cancer was estimated by multivariable adjusted conditional logistic regression models. Results: After correction for multiple testing, subjects with higher concentrations of RBC stearic acid were at higher risk for colorectal cancer (OR ¼ 1.23; 95% CI ¼ 1.07–1.42, per 1 mol%). Conversely, colorectal cancer incidence decreased with increasing proportions of RBC n-3 PUFA, particularly eicosapentaenoic acid (0.75; 0.62–0.92, per 1 mol%). The findings for the n-6 PUFA arachidonic acid were inconsistent. Conclusions: The positive association between prediagnostic RBC stearic acid and colorectal cancer reflects putative differences in FA intake and metabolism between cancer cases and matched controls, which deserve further investigation. The inverse relationship between EPA and colorectal cancer is in line with the repeatedly reported protective effect of fish consumption on colorectal cancer risk. Impact: These findings add to the evidence on colorectal cancer prevention.
show less
Download/Full Text
Keywords: Taverne, Epidemiology, Oncology
ISSN: 1055-9965
Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research Inc.
Note: Funding Information: J. Linseisen reports grants from German Cancer Aid during the conduct of the study. M.B. Schulze reports grants from German Cancer Aid and German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) during the conduct of the study. L. De Marco reports other from Becton Dickinson outside the submitted work. No disclosures were reported by the other authors. Funding Information: A. Nieters and J. Linseisen received a grant from the German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe, #106812). We thank all the participants in EPIC for their invaluable contribution to the study. The authors gratefully acknowledge the EPIC centers Spain-Asturias and UK-Cambridge for providing data. The coordination of EPIC is financially supported by the European Commission (DG-SANCO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The national cohorts are supported by Danish Cancer Society (Denmark); Ligue Contre le Cancer, Institut Gustave Roussy, Mutuelle Générale de l'Education Nationale, Institut National de la Santéet de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM; France); German Cancer Aid, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Deutsche Krebshilfe, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum and Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany); the Hellenic Health Foundation (Greece); Associazione Italiana per Publisher Copyright: © 2021 American Association for Cancer Research.
(Peer reviewed)