Assessing transitions through socio-technical configuration analysis – a methodological framework and a case study in the water sector
Heiberg, Jonas; Truffer, Bernhard; Binz, Christian
(2022) Research Policy, volume 51, issue 1, pp. 1 - 19
(Article)
Abstract
Classic accounts of transitions research have predominantly built on reconstructions of historical transition processes and in-depth case studies to identify and conceptualize socio-technical change. While such approaches have substantively improved our understanding of transitions, they often suffer from methodological nationalism and a lack of generalizability beyond spatial and sectoral boundaries.
... read more
To address this gap, we propose a novel methodology – socio-technical configuration analysis (STCA) – to map and measure socio-technical alignment processes across time and space. STCA provides a configurational and dynamic perspective on how social and technical elements get aligned into “configurations that work”, allowing for the identification of differentiated transition trajectories at and across spatial and sectoral contexts. The methodology's value is illustrated with the empirical case of an ongoing shift from centralized to more modular infrastructure configurations in the global water sector. Building on this illustration, we outline potential contributions of STCA to configurational theorizing in transition studies, sketching the contours of what we believe could become a generative epistemological approach for this field.
show less
Download/Full Text
Keywords: Discourse, Geography of transitions, Modular water technologies, Socio-technical alignments, Socio-technical configuration analysis, Strategy and Management, Management Science and Operations Research, Management of Technology and Innovation
ISSN: 0048-7333
Publisher: Elsevier
Note: Funding Information: Earlier ideas and versions of this paper have been presented at the IST conference in Manchester, 2018, at the EGOS conference in Hamburg, 2020, as well as at the IST conference in Vienna, 2020. In particular, we would like to thank our research assistant Atay Kozlovski, who has contributed to the qualitative content analysis of the empirical data. We further thank the following individuals for their help and support with the development of the ideas presented in this paper: Manuel Fischer, Mario Angst, Koen Frenken, Ron Boschma, Xiaoshan Yap, Johan Miörner, Lea Fünfschilling, Huiwen Gong, Birthe Soppe, Jochen Markard, as well as our colleagues at the Environmental Social Science Department at Eawag. The paper has furthermore strongly benefitted from comments on an earlier draft by two anonymous reviewers and by the editors of Research Policy. This research was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) within the National Research Programme “Sustainable Economy: resource-friendly, future-oriented, innovative” (NRP 73) Grant No. 407340_172366, as well as from SNSF Grant No. 10001A_179219 / 1. Any remaining shortcomings remain, of course, our own. Funding Information: Earlier ideas and versions of this paper have been presented at the IST conference in Manchester, 2018, at the EGOS conference in Hamburg, 2020, as well as at the IST conference in Vienna, 2020. In particular, we would like to thank our research assistant Atay Kozlovski, who has contributed to the qualitative content analysis of the empirical data. We further thank the following individuals for their help and support with the development of the ideas presented in this paper: Manuel Fischer, Mario Angst, Koen Frenken, Ron Boschma, Xiaoshan Yap, Johan Miörner, Lea Fünfschilling, Huiwen Gong, Birthe Soppe, Jochen Markard, as well as our colleagues at the Environmental Social Science Department at Eawag. The paper has furthermore strongly benefitted from comments on an earlier draft by two anonymous reviewers and by the editors of Research Policy. This research was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) within the National Research Programme “Sustainable Economy: resource-friendly, future-oriented, innovative” (NRP 73) Grant No. 407340_172366, as well as from SNSF Grant No. 10001A_179219 / 1. Any remaining shortcomings remain, of course, our own. Publisher Copyright: © 2021
(Peer reviewed)