Small shrubs with large importance? Smaller deer may increase the moose-forestry conflict through feeding competition over Vaccinium shrubs in the field layer
Spitzer, Robert; Coissac, Eric; Felton, Annika; Fohringer, Christian; Juvany, Laura; Landman, Marietjie; Singh, Navinder J.; Taberlet, Pierre; Widemo, Fredrik; P.G.M. Cromsigt, Joris
(2021) Forest Ecology and Management, volume 480
(Article)
Abstract
The moose (Alces alces) is a dominant large mammalian herbivore in the world’s boreal zones. Moose exert significant browsing impacts on forest vegetation and are therefore often at the centre of wildlife-forestry conflicts. Consequently, understanding the drivers of their foraging behaviour is crucial for mitigating such conflicts. Management of moose
... read more
in large parts of its range currently largely ignores the fact that moose foraging is influenced by increasing populations of sympatric deer species. In such multispecies systems, resource partitioning may be driven by foraging height and bite size. Feeding competition with smaller species might replace larger species from the field layer and drive them towards higher foraging strata offering larger bites. This bite size hypothesis has been well documented for African ungulate communities. Based on a large diet DNA metabarcoding dataset we suggest that feeding competition from three smaller deer species (red deer Cervus elaphus, fallow deer Dama dama, and roe deer Capreolus capreolus) over Vaccinium shrubs in the forest field layer might drive moose towards increasing consumption of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) in Sweden. We found that in areas of high deer density, moose diets consistently contained less Vaccinium and higher proportions of pine over three spring periods. Utilization of these food items by the smaller deer species was either unaffected by deer density or, for Vaccinium showed the opposite pattern to moose, i.e., increases of proportions in the diet of roe and red deer with increasing deer density. Availability of pine and Vaccinium, measured as proportion of available bites, did not explain the observed patterns. Our results suggest that managing key food items like Vaccinium and the populations of smaller deer may play an important role in controlling browsing impacts of moose on pine.
show less
Download/Full Text
Keywords: Alces alces, Bite size, DNA metabarcoding, Deer, Foraging behaviour, Resource partitioning, Forestry, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
ISSN: 0378-1127
Publisher: Elsevier
Note: Funding Information: We would like to thank our field personnel (in particular Sonya Juthberg, Annika Holmgren, ke Nordstr?m, Fredrik Stenbacka, Jimmy Pettersson, and Kent Nilsson) and summer workers at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) who participated in the dung counts, collection, and the processing of fecal samples. The zoo in Lycksele (V?sterbotten county, Sweden) kindly provided species-verified ungulate fecal pellets as controls. We are indebted to Delphine Rioux and Ludovic Gielly at the Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine (LECA) in Grenoble (France) for their assistance with PCR and purification. Fre?de?ric Boyer (LECA, CNRS & University Grenoble-Alpes) helped with data processing and bioinformatics. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their critical and constructive comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. This study formed part of the research program ?Beyond Moose ? ecology and management of multispecies ungulate systems? and was financially supported by the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (Naturv?rdsverket, NV-01337-15 / NV-03047-16 / NV-08503-18), Kempestiftelserna (JCK-1514), the Swedish Association for Hunting and Wildlife Management (grant 5855/2015), and V?sterbotten County's ?lgv?rdsfonden (no. 218- 9314-15). Marietjie Landman was supported by a South African National Research Foundation-Department of Science and Technology Innovation Postdoctoral Fellowship. Annika Felton was supported by the Swedish Council for Sustainable Development (2016-01140-3). Funding Information: We would like to thank our field personnel (in particular Sonya Juthberg, Annika Holmgren, ke Nordström, Fredrik Stenbacka, Jimmy Pettersson, and Kent Nilsson) and summer workers at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) who participated in the dung counts, collection, and the processing of fecal samples. The zoo in Lycksele (Västerbotten county, Sweden) kindly provided species-verified ungulate fecal pellets as controls. We are indebted to Delphine Rioux and Ludovic Gielly at the Laboratoire d’Ecologie Alpine (LECA) in Grenoble (France) for their assistance with PCR and purification. Frédéric Boyer (LECA, CNRS & University Grenoble-Alpes) helped with data processing and bioinformatics. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their critical and constructive comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. This study formed part of the research program “Beyond Moose – ecology and management of multispecies ungulate systems” and was financially supported by the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (Naturvårdsverket, NV-01337-15 / NV-03047-16 / NV-08503-18), Kempestiftelserna (JCK-1514), the Swedish Association for Hunting and Wildlife Management (grant 5855/2015), and Västerbotten County's Älgvårdsfonden (no. 218- 9314-15). Marietjie Landman was supported by a South African National Research Foundation-Department of Science and Technology Innovation Postdoctoral Fellowship. Annika Felton was supported by the Swedish Council for Sustainable Development (2016-01140-3). Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Authors
(Peer reviewed)