Metagenomics-Based Approach to Source-Attribution of Antimicrobial Resistance Determinants - Identification of Reservoir Resistome Signatures
Duarte, Ana Sofia Ribeiro; Röder, Timo; Van Gompel, Liese; Petersen, Thomas Nordahl; Hansen, Rasmus Borup; Hansen, Inge Marianne; Bossers, Alex; Aarestrup, Frank M; Wagenaar, Jaap A; Hald, Tine
(2021) Frontiers in Microbiology, volume 11, pp. 1 - 17
(Article)
Abstract
Metagenomics can unveil the genetic content of the total microbiota in different environments, such as food products and the guts of humans and livestock. It is therefore considered of great potential to investigate the transmission of foodborne hazards as part of source-attribution studies. Source-attribution of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has traditionally
... read more
relied on pathogen isolation, while metagenomics allows investigating the full span of AMR determinants. In this study, we hypothesized that the relative abundance of fecal resistome components can be associated with specific reservoirs, and that resistomes can be used for AMR source-attribution. We used shotgun-sequences from fecal samples of pigs, broilers, turkeys- and veal calves collected across Europe, and fecal samples from humans occupationally exposed to livestock in one country (pig slaughterhouse workers, pig and broiler farmers). We applied both hierarchical and flat forms of the supervised classification ensemble algorithm Random Forests to classify resistomes into corresponding reservoir classes. We identified country-specific and -independent AMR determinants, and assessed the impact of country-specific determinants when attributing AMR resistance in humans. Additionally, we performed a similarity percentage analysis with the full spectrum of AMR determinants to identify resistome signatures for the different reservoirs. We showed that the number of AMR determinants necessary to attribute a resistome into the correct reservoir increases with a larger reservoir heterogeneity, and that the impact of country-specific resistome signatures on prediction varies between countries. We predicted a higher occupational exposure to AMR determinants among workers exposed to pigs than among those exposed to broilers. Additionally, results suggested that AMR exposure on pig farms was higher than in pig slaughterhouses. Human resistomes were more similar to pig and veal calves' resistomes than to those of broilers and turkeys, and the majority of these resistome dissimilarities can be explained by a small set of AMR determinants. We identified resistome signatures for each individual reservoir, which include AMR determinants significantly associated with on-farm antimicrobial use. We attributed human resistomes to different livestock reservoirs using Random Forests, which allowed identifying pigs as a potential source of AMR in humans. This study thus demonstrates that it is possible to apply metagenomics in AMR source-attribution.
show less
Download/Full Text
Keywords: antimicrobial resistance, machine learning, metagenomics, random forests, resistome, source-attribution, Microbiology, Microbiology (medical)
ISSN: 1664-302X
Publisher: Frontiers Media S.A.
Note: Funding Information: This work was part of the Ecology from Farm to Fork Of microbial drug Resistance and Transmission (EFFORT) project, funded by the European Commission, 7th Framework Program for Research and Innovation (FP7-KBBE-2013–7, grant agreement: 613754). Funding Information: We are thankful to all farmers and veterinarians who participated in the EFFORT study and to all those who participated in sampling and sample handling. We are also grateful for all laboratory assistance for the sequencing of samples at the Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University (IRAS, UU), and at the Technical University of Denmark (DTU). Funding. This work was part of the Ecology from Farm to Fork Of microbial drug Resistance and Transmission (EFFORT) project, funded by the European Commission, 7th Framework Program for Research and Innovation (FP7-KBBE-2013?7, grant agreement: 613754). Publisher Copyright: © Copyright © 2021 Duarte, Röder, Van Gompel, Petersen, Hansen, Hansen, Bossers, Aarestrup, Wagenaar and Hald. Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
(Peer reviewed)