The role of different Culex mosquito species in the transmission of West Nile virus and avian malaria parasites in Mediterranean areas
Ferraguti, Martina; Heesterbeek, Hans; Martínez-de la Puente, Josué; Jiménez-Clavero, Miguel Ángel; Vázquez, Ana; Ruiz, Santiago; Llorente, Francisco; Roiz, David; Vernooij, Hans; Soriguer, Ramón; Figuerola, Jordi
(2021) Transboundary and emerging diseases, volume 68, issue 2, pp. 920 - 930
(Article)
Abstract
Vector-borne diseases, especially those transmitted by mosquitoes, have severe impacts on public health and economy. West Nile virus (WNV) and avian malaria parasites of the genus Plasmodium are mosquito-borne pathogens that may produce severe disease and illness in humans and birds, respectively, and circulate in an endemic form in southern
... read more
Europe. Here, we used field-collected data to identify the impact of Culex pipiens, Cx. perexiguus and Cx. modestus, on the circulation of both WNV and Plasmodium in Andalusia (SW Spain) using mathematical modelling of the basic reproduction number (R0). Models were calibrated with field-collected data on WNV seroprevalence and Plasmodium infection in wild house sparrows, presence of WNV and Plasmodium in mosquito pools, and mosquito blood-feeding patterns. This approach allowed us to determine the contribution of each vector species to pathogen amplification. Overall, 0.7% and 29.6% of house sparrows were positive to WNV antibodies and Plasmodium infection, respectively. In addition, the prevalence of Plasmodium was higher in Cx. pipiens (2.0%), followed by Cx. perexiguus (1.8%) and Cx. modestus (0.7%). Three pools of Cx. perexiguus were positive to WVN. Models identified Cx. perexiguus as the most important species contributing to the amplification of WNV in southern Spain. For Plasmodium models, R0 values were higher when Cx. pipiens was present in the population, either alone or in combination with the other mosquito species. These results suggest that the transmission of these vector-borne pathogens depends on different Culex species, and consequently, their transmission niches will present different spatial and temporal patterns. For WNV, targeted surveillance and control of Cx. perexiguus populations appear as the most effective measure to reduce WNV amplification. Also, preventing Culex populations near human settlements, or reducing the abundance of these species, are potential strategies to reduce WNV spillover into human populations in southern Spain.
show less
Download/Full Text
Keywords: Basic reproduction number R0, Culex perexiguus, Culex pipiens, Culex modestus, emerging infectious diseases, flavivirus, Haemosporidia, mosquitoes, Passer domesticus, vector-bornepathogens, zoonosis, Taverne, General Veterinary, General Immunology and Microbiology
ISSN: 1865-1682
Publisher: Wiley
Note: Funding Information: This study was funded by projects CGL2015‐65055‐P and PGC2018‐095704‐B‐I00 from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, P11‐RNM‐7038 from the Junta de Andalucía, and CP13/00114 from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III. MF was funded by a FPU grant and a Juan de la Cierva 2017 Formación contract (FJCI‐2017‐34394) from the Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities and partially financed by a grant from the Spanish Society of Ethology and Evolutionary Ecology (SEEEE Research Grant, Call 2017). JMP was funded by a 2017 Leonardo Grant for Researchers and Cultural Creators, BBVA Foundation. The BBVA Foundation accepts no responsibility for the opinions, statements and contents included in the project and/or the results thereof, which are entirely the responsibility of the authors. We are grateful to Alberto Pastoriza, Manuel Vázquez, Manolo Lobón, Óscar González, Carlos Moreno, Cristina Pérez, Esmeralda Pérez, Juana Moreno Fernández and Antonio Magallanes Martín de Oliva for their help during the fieldwork and with mosquito capture and identification, and to Isabel Martín, Francisco M. Miranda, Olaya García, María del Carmen Barbero Ameller, Laura Herrero and Antonio Sanz for their help with the laboratory analyses. Funding Information: This study was funded by projects CGL2015-65055-P and PGC2018-095704-B-I00 from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, P11-RNM-7038 from the Junta de Andaluc?a, and CP13/00114 from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III. MF was funded by a FPU grant and a Juan de la Cierva 2017 Formaci?n contract (FJCI-2017-34394) from the Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities and partially financed by a grant from the Spanish Society of Ethology and Evolutionary Ecology (SEEEE Research Grant, Call 2017). JMP was funded by a 2017 Leonardo Grant for Researchers and Cultural Creators, BBVA Foundation. The BBVA Foundation accepts no responsibility for the opinions, statements and contents included in the project and/or the results thereof, which are entirely the responsibility of the authors. We are grateful to Alberto Pastoriza, Manuel V?zquez, Manolo Lob?n, ?scar Gonz?lez, Carlos Moreno, Cristina P?rez, Esmeralda P?rez, Juana Moreno Fern?ndez and Antonio Magallanes Mart?n de Oliva for their help during the fieldwork and with mosquito capture and identification, and to Isabel Mart?n, Francisco M. Miranda, Olaya Garc?a, Mar?a del Carmen Barbero Ameller, Laura Herrero and Antonio Sanz for their help with the laboratory analyses. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Wiley-VCH GmbH
(Peer reviewed)
