LiDAR-derived high-resolution palaeo-DEM construction workflow and application to the early medieval Lower Rhine valley and upper delta

Abstract

Reconstruction of past topography in palaeo-DEMs serves various geomorphological analyses. Constructing a palaeo-DEM by stripping young elements from a LiDAR DEM can provide results for large study areas at high resolution. However, such a ‘top-down’ approach is more suited to recent periods and geomorphologically static parts of the landscape than to geomorphologically dynamic areas and periods farther back in time. Here, we explore this approach by reconstructing the early medieval (circa 800 CE) topography of the Lower Rhine River valley and upper delta in Germany and the Netherlands. The large (4500 km2) study area contains abundant anthropogenic terrain modification and stretches across geomorphologically active as well as inactive zones. We first removed all anthropogenic relief elements from the LiDAR DEM, using separate procedures for linear and non-linear elements. These steps were sufficient to obtain the palaeotopography of the inactive zone, characterized by inherited natural relief. Then, we reconstructed the topography and bathymetry in the fluvially-reworked active zone by incorporating geological and historical geographical information. We present and evaluate zonal averages of elevation differences between the modern and past valley floor topography in this densely populated area with complex land use history, which allows to approximate total anthropogenic volumetric change. Comparison with the modern LiDAR DEM established change in floodplain negative-relief connectivity, showing the potential importance of investing in palaeo-DEMs when assessing past river flooding. Our palaeo-DEM construction workflow is deployable at diverse spatial scales and widely applicable to other lowland areas, because of its top-down and generic nature. The relative importance of different workflow aspects depends on the time period that is targeted. Beyond a target age of 10-15 ka, a too large area of valley floor is to be considered geomorphologically dynamic and the top-down approach to palaeo-DEM construction is no longer advisable.