Surgical treatment of Neer type II and type V lateral clavicular fractures: comparison of hook plate versus superior plate with lateral extension: a retrospective cohort study
Ochen, Yassine; Frima, Herman; Houwert, R Marijn; Heng, Marilyn; van Heijl, Mark; Verleisdonk, Egbert J M M; van der Velde, Detlef
(2019) Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, volume 29, issue 5, pp. 989 - 997
(Article)
Abstract
PURPOSE: Different fixation methods are used for treatment of unstable lateral clavicle fractures (LCF). Definitive consensus and guidelines for the surgical fixation of LCF have not been established. The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported functional outcome after open reduction and internal fixation with the clavicle hook plate
... read more
(CHP) and the superior clavicle plate with lateral extension (SCPLE). METHODS: A dual-center retrospective cohort study was performed. All patients operatively treated for unstable Neer type II and type V LCF between 2011 and 2016, with the CHP (n = 23) or SCPLE (n = 53), were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was the QuickDASH score. Secondary outcomes were the numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score, complications, and implant removal. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients (88%) were available for the final follow-up. There was a significant difference in bicortical lateral fragment size, 15 mm (± 4, range 6-21) in the CPH group compared to 20 mm (± 8, range 8-43) in the SCPLE group (p ≤ 0.001). There was no significant difference in median QuickDASH score (CHP; 0.00 [IQR 0.0-0.0], SCPLE; 0.00 [IQR 0.0-4.5]; p = 0.073) or other functional outcome scores (NRS at rest; p = 0.373, NRS during activity; p = 0.559). There was no significant difference in median QuickDASH score or other functional outcome scores between Neer type II and type V fractures. There was no significant difference in complication rate, CHP 11% and SCPLE 8% (relative risk 1.26; [95% CI 0.25-6.33; p = 0.777]). The implant removal rate was 100% in the CHP group compared to 42% in the SCPLE group (relative risk 2.40; [95% CI 1.72-3.35; p ≤ 0.001]). CONCLUSION: Both the CHP and SCPLE are effective fixation methods for the treatment of unstable LCF, resulting in excellent patient-reported functional outcome and similar complication rates. SCPLE fixation is an effective fixation method for the treatment of both Neer type II and type V LCF. The SCPLE has a lower implant removal rate. Therefore, if technically feasible, we recommend SCPLE fixation for the treatment of unstable LCF.
show less
Download/Full Text
Keywords: Clavicle hook plate, Lateral clavicle fracture, Plate fixation, Superior clavicle plate with lateral extension, Unstable, Humans, Middle Aged, Fractures, Bone/diagnosis, Clavicle/diagnostic imaging, Male, Open Fracture Reduction/adverse effects, Bone Plates, Recovery of Function, Radiography/methods, Adult, Female, Postoperative Complications/diagnosis, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects, Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Journal Article, Comparative Study
ISSN: 1633-8065
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
(Peer reviewed)