Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial
de Koning, Harry J; van der Aalst, Carlijn M; de Jong, Pim A; Scholten, Ernst T; Nackaerts, Kristiaan; Heuvelmans, Marjolein A; Lammers, Jan-Willem J; Weenink, Carla; Yousaf-Khan, Uraujh; Horeweg, Nanda; van 't Westeinde, Susan; Prokop, Mathias; Mali, Willem P; Mohamed Hoesein, Firdaus A A; van Ooijen, Peter M A; Aerts, Joachim G J V; den Bakker, Michael A; Thunnissen, Erik; Verschakelen, Johny; Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn; Walter, Joan E; Ten Haaf, Kevin; Groen, Harry J M; Oudkerk, Matthijs
(2020) The New England journal of medicine, volume 382, issue 6, pp. 503 - 513
(Article)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are limited data from randomized trials regarding whether volume-based, low-dose computed tomographic (CT) screening can reduce lung-cancer mortality among male former and current smokers. METHODS: A total of 13,195 men (primary analysis) and 2594 women (subgroup analyses) between the ages of 50 and 74 were randomly assigned to
... read more
undergo CT screening at T0 (baseline), year 1, year 3, and year 5.5 or no screening. We obtained data on cancer diagnosis and the date and cause of death through linkages with national registries in the Netherlands and Belgium, and a review committee confirmed lung cancer as the cause of death when possible. A minimum follow-up of 10 years until December 31, 2015, was completed for all participants. RESULTS: Among men, the average adherence to CT screening was 90.0%. On average, 9.2% of the screened participants underwent at least one additional CT scan (initially indeterminate). The overall referral rate for suspicious nodules was 2.1%. At 10 years of follow-up, the incidence of lung cancer was 5.58 cases per 1000 person-years in the screening group and 4.91 cases per 1000 person-years in the control group; lung-cancer mortality was 2.50 deaths per 1000 person-years and 3.30 deaths per 1000 person-years, respectively. The cumulative rate ratio for death from lung cancer at 10 years was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 0.94; P = 0.01) in the screening group as compared with the control group, similar to the values at years 8 and 9. Among women, the rate ratio was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.38 to 1.14) at 10 years of follow-up, with values of 0.41 to 0.52 in years 7 through 9. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial involving high-risk persons, lung-cancer mortality was significantly lower among those who underwent volume CT screening than among those who underwent no screening. There were low rates of follow-up procedures for results suggestive of lung cancer. (Funded by the Netherlands Organization of Health Research and Development and others; NELSON Netherlands Trial Register number, NL580.).
show less
Download/Full Text
The full text of this publication is not available.
Keywords: lung cancer, General Medicine
ISSN: 0028-4793
Publisher: Massachussetts Medical Society
Note: Funding Information: Supported by the Netherlands Organization of Health Research and Development, the Dutch Cancer Society (KWF Kankerbestrijding), the Health Insurance Innovation Foundation (Innovatiefonds Zorgverzekeraars), G.Ph. Verhagen Sticht-ing, the Rotterdam Oncologic Thoracic Study Group, the Erasmus Trust Fund, Stichting tegen Kanker, Vlaamse Liga tegen Kanker, and Lokaal Gezondheids Overleg (LOGO) Leuven. Siemens Germany provided four workstations and software for volume measurements. Funding Information: Supported by the Netherlands Organization of Health Research and Development, the Dutch Cancer Society (KWF Kankerbestrijding), the Health Insurance Innovation Foundation (Innovatiefonds Zorgverzekeraars), G.Ph. Verhagen Stichting, the Rotterdam Oncologic Thoracic Study Group, the Erasmus Trust Fund, Stichting tegen Kanker, Vlaamse Liga tegen Kanker, and Lokaal Gezondheids Overleg (LOGO) Leuven. Siemens Germany provided four workstations and software for volume measurements. Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2020 Massachusetts Medical Society.
(Peer reviewed)