A cost analysis of upfront DPYD genotype-guided dose individualisation in fluoropyrimidine-based anticancer therapy
Henricks, Linda M; Lunenburg, Carin A T C; de Man, Femke M; Meulendijks, Didier; Frederix, Geert W J; Kienhuis, Emma; Creemers, Geert-Jan; Baars, Arnold; Dezentjé, Vincent O; Imholz, Alexander L T; Jeurissen, Frank J F; Portielje, Johanna E A; Jansen, Rob L H; Hamberg, Paul; Ten Tije, Albert J; Droogendijk, Helga J; Koopman, Miriam; Nieboer, Peter; van de Poel, Marlène H W; Mandigers, Caroline M P W; Rosing, Hilde; Beijnen, Jos H; van Werkhoven, Erik; van Kuilenburg, André B P; van Schaik, Ron H N; Mathijssen, Ron H J; Swen, Jesse J; Gelderblom, Hans; Cats, Annemieke; Guchelaar, Henk-Jan; Schellens, Jan H M
(2019) European Journal of Cancer, volume 107, pp. 60 - 67
(Article)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fluoropyrimidine therapy including capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil can result in severe treatment-related toxicity in up to 30% of patients. Toxicity is often related to reduced activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, the main metabolic fluoropyrimidine enzyme, primarily caused by genetic DPYD polymorphisms. In a large prospective study, it was concluded that upfront
... read more
DPYD-guided dose individualisation is able to improve safety of fluoropyrimidine-based therapy. In our current analysis, we evaluated whether this strategy is cost saving. METHODS: A cost-minimisation analysis from a health-care payer perspective was performed as part of the prospective clinical trial (NCT02324452) in which patients prior to start of fluoropyrimidine-based therapy were screened for the DPYD variants DPYD*2A, c.2846A>T, c.1679T>G and c.1236G>A and received an initial dose reduction of 25% (c.2846A>T, c.1236G>A) or 50% (DPYD*2A, c.1679T>G). Data on treatment, toxicity, hospitalisation and other toxicity-related interventions were collected. The model compared prospective screening for these DPYD variants with no DPYD screening. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were also performed. RESULTS: Expected total costs of the screening strategy were €2599 per patient compared with €2650 for non-screening, resulting in a net cost saving of €51 per patient. Results of the probabilistic sensitivity and one-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the screening strategy was very likely to be cost saving or worst case cost-neutral. CONCLUSIONS: Upfront DPYD-guided dose individualisation, improving patient safety, is cost saving or cost-neutral but is not expected to yield additional costs. These results endorse implementing DPYD screening before start of fluoropyrimidine treatment as standard of care.
show less
Download/Full Text
Keywords: cost-analysis, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, DPYD, pharmacogenetics, fluoropyrimidines, genotyping, toxicity, Taverne
ISSN: 0959-8049
Publisher: Elsevier Ltd
Note: Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
(Peer reviewed)