Cervical ultrasonography has no additional value over negative 18F-FDG PET/CT scans for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with oesophageal cancer
Goense, Lucas; Meziani, Jihane; van Rossum, Peter S.N.; Wessels, Frank J.; Lam, Marnix G.E.H.; van Hillegersberg, Richard; Ruurda, Jelle P.
(2018) European Radiology, volume 28, issue 5, pp. 2031 - 2037
(Article)
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the additional value of cervical ultrasonography over 18F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer. Methods: Between January 2013 and January 2016, 163 patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer underwent both cervical ultrasonography and 18F-FDG PET/CT at a tertiary referral
... read more
centre in the Netherlands. Retrospective clinical data analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic value of cervical ultrasonography and 18F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of cervical lymph node metastases. Fine needle aspiration or clinical follow-up was used as reference standard. Results: The overall incidence of patients with cervical lymph node metastases was 14%. The sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET/CT to detect cervical lymph node metastases was 82% (95% CI 59–94%) and specificity was 91% (95% CI 85–95%). The sensitivity and specificity of cervical ultrasonography were 73% (95% CI 50–88%) and 84% (95% CI 77–90%), respectively. In patients with a negative 18F-FDG PET/CT, 12 of 133 (9%) patients had suspicious nodes on cervical ultrasonography. In all these 12 patients the nodes were confirmed benign. Conclusions: Cervical ultrasonography has no additional diagnostic value to a negative integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of cervical lymph node metastases in patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer. Key Points: • Cervical ultrasonography has no value over PET/CT in evaluating cervical node metastases.• PET/CT provides greater diagnostic confidence compared to cervical ultrasonography.• Cervical ultrasonography during standard diagnostic work-up may be considered unnecessary.• Cervical lesions on PET/CT require cytopathological confirmation by FNA.
show less
Download/Full Text
Keywords: F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography, Cancer staging, Cervical lymph node metastases, Cervical ultrasonography, Oesophageal cancer, Reproducibility of Results, Humans, Ultrasonography/methods, Male, Neck/pathology, Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging, Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology, Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology, Sensitivity and Specificity, Female, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography/methods, Radiopharmaceuticals, Cervical lymphnode metastases, F-18-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography, Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Journal Article
ISSN: 0938-7994
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
(Peer reviewed)