An economic analysis of immediate delivery and expectant monitoring in women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, between 34 and 37 weeks of gestation (HYPITAT-II)
van Baaren, G.J.; Broekhuijsen, K; Pampus, M.G.; Ganzevoort, W.; Sikkema, J Marko; Woiski, Mallory D; Oudijk, M. A.; Bloemenkamp, K. W.M.; Scheepers, Hubertina C. J.; Bremer, Henk A; Rijnders, Robbert J. P.; van Loon, A. J.; Perquin, Denise A M; Sporken, Jan M J; Papatsonis, D N M; van Huizen, M E; Vredevoogd, C B; Brons, Jozien T J; Kaplan, M.; van Kaam, Anton H.; Groen, H.; Porath, M.; van den Berg, P.; Mol, B. W J; Franssen, Maureen T. M.; Langenveld, J; the HYPITAT-II Study Group
(2017) BJOG - An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, volume 124, issue 3, pp. 453 - 461
(Article)
Abstract
Objective: To assess the economic consequences of immediate delivery compared with expectant monitoring in women with preterm non-severe hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Design: A cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial (HYPITAT-II). Setting: Obstetric departments of seven academic hospitals and 44 non-academic hospitals in the Netherlands. Population: Women diagnosed with
... read more
non-severe hypertensive disorders of pregnancy between 340/7 and 370/7 weeks of gestation, randomly allocated to either immediate delivery or expectant monitoring. Methods: A trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from a healthcare perspective until final maternal and neonatal discharge. Main outcome measures: Health outcomes were expressed as the prevalence of respiratory distress syndrome, defined as the need for supplemental oxygen for >24 hours combined with radiographic findings typical for respiratory distress syndrome. Costs were estimated from a healthcare perspective until maternal and neonatal discharge. Results: The average costs of immediate delivery (n = 352) were €10 245 versus €9563 for expectant monitoring (n = 351), with an average difference of €682 (95% confidence interval, 95% CI −€618 to €2126). This 7% difference predominantly originated from the neonatal admissions, which were €5672 in the immediate delivery arm and €3929 in the expectant monitoring arm. Conclusion: In women with mild hypertensive disorders between 340/7 and 370/7 weeks of gestation, immediate delivery is more costly than expectant monitoring as a result of differences in neonatal admissions. These findings support expectant monitoring, as the clinical outcomes of the trial demonstrated that expectant monitoring reduced respiratory distress syndrome for a slightly increased risk of maternal complications. Tweetable abstract: Expectant management in preterm hypertensive disorders is less costly compared with immediate delivery.
show less
Download/Full Text
The full text of this publication is not available.
Keywords: Economic evaluation, expectant monitoring, hypertensive disorders, immediate delivery, preterm, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Journal Article
ISSN: 1470-0328
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Note: Publisher Copyright: © 2016 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
(Peer reviewed)