Informed public opinions on CCS in comparison to other mitigation options

de Best-Waldhober, M.; Daamen, D.; Ramírez Ramírez, C.A.; Faaij, A.P.C.; Hendriks, C.; de Visser, Erika; Simöes, S.; Cabal, H.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.306

Informed public opinions on CCS in comparison to other mitigation options

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Informed public opinions on CCS in comparison to other mitigation options

de Best-Waldhober, M.; Daamen, D.; Ramírez Ramírez, C.A.; Faaij, A.P.C.; Hendriks, C.; de Visser, Erika; Simöes, S.; Cabal, H.

(2011) Energy Procedia, volume 1, issue 1, pp. 4795 - 4802

(Article)

Abstract

In this study, an Information-Choice Questionnaire (ICQ) was used to find out how a representative sample of the Dutch public (n =971) would evaluate and choose between seven mitigation options after having been thoroughly informed. The results suggest that due to the comparison with other mitigation options, people are less ... read more

Download/Full Text

Embargo until January 01 2050

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.306

ISSN: 1876-6102

Publisher: Elsevier BV

Note: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-9), 16–20 November 2008, Washington DC, USA

(Peer reviewed)

See more statistics about this item