Abstract
It is generally assumed that the
incidence of allergies in the Western world has been rising over the past few
decades. Apple allergy was chosen as a model system because apples are widely
consumed in Europe and they frequently cause allergic reactions with a variable
degree of severity. In Northern and Central Europe, apple
allergy
... read more
has always been described as a mild disease. More recent observations
from Southern European countries indicate that apple can induce severe systemic
reactions as well.
Chapter 2
describes the apple allergic patients from Austria, Italy, Spain and The Netherlands. Different sensitization patterns were studied RAST, SPT and. clinical
histories were studied. Our studies in four European countries have confirmed
that the presence of birch trees is a dominant factor in sensitization to the
major apple allergen Mal d 1. Primary sensitization to the major birch pollen
allergen Bet v 1 is at the basis of IgE recognition of Mal d 1 in Northern and Central Europe. Apple allergy (LTP) in Spain is most likely a result of
primary sensitization to peach. It can also not be ruled out completely that
specific pollen in the Mediterranean are at the basis of LTP sensitization.
In Chapters 3
and 4 two novel forms of cross-reactive food allergies among birch pollen
allergic patients are presented, i.e. to jackfruit and sharonfruit. In both
cases patients reacted on the first exposure to the fruit involved and more
severely than they used to do on apple and other fruits. These studies suggest
that some food homologs of Bet v 1 might be more stable than the extremely
labile Mal d 1 from apple. Jackfruit and sharonfruit allergy can be added to
the list of birch pollen related food allergies. Increased consumption of these
fruits will result in a rise in allergic symptoms.
Treatment of food allergic patients is primarily based on
avoidance diets. Such diets can have a considerable social impact and lead to
nutritional deficiencies.
In Chapter 5
the allergenicity of different apple cultivars was assessed by SPT and
double-blind, placebo controlled food challenge to develop hypoallergenic fruit
Chapter 6
describes the development of a hypoallergenic apple plant in which the Mal d 1
gene was knocked out by RNA interference. Using leaf material of young
plantlets for SPT and immunoblot, it was demonstrated that Mal d 1 activity was
indeed reduced significantly in the mutant plantlets.
Public opinion
on genetically modified foods has proven to be perhaps a bigger hurdle. The
attitude of the allergic patients towards hypoallergenic genetically modified
foods was investigated and described in
Chapter 7. Finally, two chapters
focus on strategies for allergen-specific immunotherapy. Specific immunotherapy is not used to treat food allergies.
A major problem of immunotherapy using food allergens is the risk of severe
side effects, including anaphylactic shock.
In Chapter 8,
a study using birch pollen immunotherapy trial is described in which the effect
on cross-reactive apple allergy is evaluated by SPT and DBPCFC. Our clinical
trial supports earlier claims that birch pollen immunotherapy has a beneficial
effect on cross-reactive food allergies.
In Chapter 9, a recently
developed hypoallergenic mutant of the major apple allergen Mal d 1 is
evaluated in vivo using SPT and DBPCFC. It was demonstrated that the
mutant indeed behaved as a hypoallergen. Hypoallergenic mutants are potential
candidates for future use in immunotherapy.
show less