<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-05T06:49:39.091295048Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.library.uu.nl:1874/385921" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://dspace.library.uu.nl/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.library.uu.nl:1874/385921</identifier><datestamp>2026-03-27T08:37:56Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1874_296827</setSpec><setSpec>col_1874_296828</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess</dc:rights>
   <dc:title>How to include socio-economic considerations in decision-making on agricultural biotechnology? Two models from Kenya and South Africa</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Beumer, K.</dc:creator>
   <dc:subject>GMO</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Regulation</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Socio-economic considerations</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Genetic modification</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Kenya</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>South Africa</dc:subject>
   <dc:description>This article contributes to the debate about how regulatory science for agricultural technologies can be ‘opened up’ for a more diverse set of concerns and knowledges. The article focuses on the regulation of ‘socio-economic considerations’ for genetically modified organisms. While numerous countries have declared their intent to include these considerations in biotechnology decision-making, it is currently unclear both what counts as a socio-economic consideration and how such considerations should be assessed. This article provides greater clarity about how socio-economic considerations can be included in regulations by drawing upon the experience of two countries whose efforts in this field are particularly advanced: Kenya and South Africa. Based on extensive fieldwork, this article identifies the contours of an emerging regulatory regime by presenting two practice-based models for including socio-economic considerations in biotechnology decision-making. Whereas Kenya has taken a bottom-up process prior to assessing the first technologies and strongly emphasises scientific expertise, South Africa has instead established regulatory standards in an ad hoc fashion on a case-to-case basis, with a less prominent role for scientific evidence. The discussion of the distinct characteristics and tensions of both models provides insight into two potential pathways for including socio-economic considerations in the regulation of agricultural technologies.</dc:description>
   <dc:creator>Innovation and Sustainability</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Innovation Studies</dc:creator>
   <dc:date>2019</dc:date>
   <dc:type>Article</dc:type>
   <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
   <dc:identifier>https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/385921</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>Agriculture and Human Values 36(4), - (2019)</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>en</dc:language>
   <dc:relation>0889-048X</dc:relation>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>