2024-03-29T10:36:01Zhttps://dspace.library.uu.nl/oai/dareoai:dspace.library.uu.nl:1874/326342024-02-23T16:56:10Zcom_1874_296827col_1874_296828dare
URN:NBN:NL:UI:10-1874-32634
2024-02-23T17:56:10.074Z
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/32634
How to talk about unobservables
Muller
F.A.
aut
van Fraassen
B.C.
aut
History and Foundations of Science
aut
Dep Natuurkunde
aut
text
info:eu-repo/semantics/Article
2008
other
In this journal, Dicken & Lipton [2006] argued, following Musgrave [1985], that a constructive empiricist cannot coherently draw the distinction between observable objects (events, processes, …) and unobservable ones. We argue to the contrary: the distinction can be drawn coherently, but add a qualification to deal with an associated problem concerning the language of science.
Analysis
Oxford University Press
2008
0003-2638
68
3
197
1874/32634
2024-02-23T17:56:10.074Z
http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess