The effect of an mHealth clinical decision-making support system on neonatal mortality in a low resource setting: A cluster-randomized controlled trial
Amoakoh, Hannah Brown; Klipstein-Grobusch, Kerstin; Agyepong, Irene Akua; Zuithoff, Nicolaas P.A.; Amoakoh-Coleman, Mary; Kayode, Gbenga A.; Sarpong, Charity; Reitsma, Johannes B.; Grobbee, Diederick E.; Ansah, Evelyn K.
(2019) EClinicalMedicine, volume 12, pp. 31 - 42
(Article)
Abstract
Background: MHealth interventions promise to bridge gaps in clinical care but documentation of their effectiveness is limited. We evaluated the utilization and effect of an mhealth clinical decision-making support intervention that aimed to improve neonatal mortality in Ghana by providing access to emergency neonatal protocols for frontline health workers. Methods:
... read more
In the Eastern Region of Ghana, sixteen districts were randomized into two study arms (8 intervention and 8 control clusters) in a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Institutional neonatal mortality data were extracted from the District Health Information System-2 during an 18-month intervention period. We performed an intention-to-treat analysis and estimated the effect of the intervention on institutional neonatal mortality (primary outcome measure) using grouped binomial logistic regression with a random intercept per cluster. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02468310) and Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR20151200109073). Findings: There were 65,831 institutional deliveries and 348 institutional neonatal deaths during the study period. Overall, 47 ∙ 3% of deliveries and 56 ∙ 9% of neonatal deaths occurred in the intervention arm. During the intervention period, neonatal deaths increased from 4 ∙ 5 to 6 ∙ 4 deaths and, from 3 ∙ 9 to 4 ∙ 3 deaths per 1000 deliveries in the intervention arm and control arm respectively. The odds of neonatal death was 2⋅09 (95% CI (1 ∙ 00;4 ∙ 38); p = 0 ∙ 051) times higher in the intervention arm compared to the control arm (adjusted odds ratio). The correlation between the number of protocol requests and the number of deliveries per intervention cluster was 0 ∙ 71 (p = 0 ∙ 05). Interpretation: The higher risk of institutional neonatal death observed in intervention clusters may be due to problems with birth and death registration, unmeasured and unadjusted confounding, and unintended use of the intervention. The findings underpin the need for careful and rigorous evaluation of mHealth intervention implementation and effects. Funding: Netherlands Foundation for Scientific Research - WOTRO, Science for Global Development; Utrecht University.
show less
Download/Full Text
Keywords: Ghana, Low and middle income countries, mHealth, Neonatal mortality, General Medicine, Journal Article
ISSN: 2589-5370
Publisher: Elsevier
Note: Funding Information: The authors thank the Ghana Health Service Research and Development Division, the Eastern Region Health Directorate, members of the district health management teams in the Eastern Region and the School of Public Health, University of Ghana for their support in the conduct of this study. We also thank Richard Kwofie of Vodafone Ghana for his support in extracting the USSD data. We also thank the Netherlands Foundation for Scientific Research, Global Health Policy and Health Systems Research Program (Grant Number: 07.45.102.00) and the Julius Center, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Netherlands for financial support. HBA has been supported by a Global Health Scholarship Grant from the University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands. The funders of this study played no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation of data, writing of the report and in the decision to submit the paper for publication. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. HBA, KKG, MAC, KAG, IAA, CS, DEG and EA designed and performed the study. HBA, JBR and NPAZ analyzed the study. HBA drafted the manuscript and KKG, EA, JBR and NPAZ reviewed the manuscript. IAA, DEG, MAC, KAG, provided critical comments on the review of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. De-identified individual level data and cluster level data used to assess the primary outcome can be assessed upon publication by making a formal request to the Ghana Health Service at info@ghsmail.org. All variables needed to recreate the results of the primary outcome measure are available in the district health information management system of Ghana. De-identified data regarding the use of the USSD can be assessed by emailing the corresponding author at ansomaame@hotmail.com. The USSD data will be available upon publication for a period of 5?years and following a signed data access agreement. Funding Information: The authors thank the Ghana Health Service Research and Development Division, the Eastern Region Health Directorate, members of the district health management teams in the Eastern Region and the School of Public Health, University of Ghana for their support in the conduct of this study. We also thank Richard Kwofie of Vodafone Ghana for his support in extracting the USSD data. We also thank the Netherlands Foundation for Scientific Research , Global Health Policy and Health Systems Research Program (Grant Number: 07.45.102.00 ) and the Julius Center, University Medical Centre Utrecht , Netherlands for financial support. HBA has been supported by a Global Health Scholarship Grant from the University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands. The funders of this study played no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation of data, writing of the report and in the decision to submit the paper for publication. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. Publisher Copyright: © 2019
(Peer reviewed)